|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-06-2005, 04:29 PM
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 37
Posts: 2,418
|
I thought the Skins were done signing
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
04-06-2005, 04:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
They see someone they want they'll jump on it we all know that.
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 06:20 PM
|
#3 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 421
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Good move. Cheap and a focused on fixing our weak special teams coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 07:14 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Now if only we could outright cut Brunell and Ramsey and bring in someone that will not look like a wounded, drunk, duck in the pocket we would be okay.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 07:17 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
Now if only we could get SKINZ_DOMIN8 to kick the crack habit and post sober..... |
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 07:20 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 59
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
crack kills! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 07:36 PM
|
#7 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Q: How do you make SKINZ_DOMIN8 laugh on Wednesday?
A: Tell him the joke on Sunday Ba-Zing!!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 08:52 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
Instead of resulting to insults why don't you attempt to prove me wrong? Or did I insult your man-crush on your boy Ramsey? |
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 08:57 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 09:01 PM
|
#10 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 125
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
God forbid we have a QB around for 4 years that is probably the longest stretch since Theismann no??
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 09:42 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
I find it quite telling that you freely admit his win-loss record is abyssmal. Isn't that what it is all about? As far as progress.........what progress are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 09:45 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
Except if that Qb sucks and has proven nothing (like your hero Ramseygirl) then what? |
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 10:00 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Quote:
I'm pretty sure I wrote that the win-loss record isn't over .500, I didn't say abysmmal Progress-I'm talking about learning to throw the ball away and not take a sack and loss of yards, I'm talking about checking off receivers, I'm talking about knowing when to call timeout. It's probably just me, I am afterall an idiot, but I do see him becoming a better QB Who's your answer at QB?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 10:36 PM
|
#14 |
|
\m/
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,336
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
I'm tired of defending my opinion on Ramsey, but here it is again nice and simple.
I think he's got potential, like it or not he DOES have a strong arm. He's also a tough kid, he's got alot of the intangibles people look for. I'm not saying he's the next Marino, I don't think anybody is stupid enough to say that. He's got a long way to go, but the potential for him being a quality QB is there. If you disagree, fine, no problem. But at least let's have a logical discussion about it, all you've done, Skinz_domin8 (zackmills), is say how much he sucks, he's the biggest bust in Skins history, etc. If that's your view, fine, but at least back it up with some original thought. I could at least respect a well thought out opinion. |
|
|
|
|
04-06-2005, 11:16 PM
|
#15 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: I thought the Skins were done signing
Give Ramsey (and the rest of the team) some continuity. The man now has to adjust to all new receivers (well, McCants, Thrash, and Jacobs, but he didn't exactly get many balls to them last year) and it's his 2nd year in a system. Let's look at QBs picked in round 1 that year.
David Carr - Carr is better. No arguments. You'd hope so for the #1 overall. Joey Harrington - picked at #3, so far isn't as good as Ramsey, and in my mind has a better offense to work with. Roy Williams, and one game a year with Charles Rogers. Young team, granted. Still, he's been their downfall. We then pickup Ramsey as the last pick in the first round. Not a bad investment. Besides Josh McCown not a single other QB from that class has really seen any significant time on the field. So talent for price we got the best deal out of that QB class. Better than the #3 pick, but a little behind the #1. Not bad at all. This was definitely one of Spurrier/Vinnies better personel pickups, in my opinion.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
