View Single Post
Old 10-23-2006, 06:21 PM   #36
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: Does Anyone Want To Compare Brunell To Manning Now????

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Moss, and ARE are runners. They excel when you get them the ball quickly in the open field and let them run. The key is the open field part.
there's lots of open field above the safeties too.


Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
And my problem is not going deep. It's with low percentage passes that don't work that have no purpose but to "open up the run". Offensively, you are going to layer your passing attack. So it becomes a progressionary thing. You throw deep to the open man when its given to you. We do this. We only get about 1-2 chances a game, but we certainly do this. The reason you only get 1-2 chances isn't rocket science. It's only going to occur when those DBs are in zone, and don't get help, because the safeties are out of position trying to take away something shorter. It's why the shorter routes are so successful. You can throw them over and over, and the defense can't always afford to gamble to stop them. We have had great success throwing those routes this year and it should shock no one. Also, it may not be that apparent, but we don't throw screens and dumpoffs every play. That's why they are often there.
can't believe you think "opening up the run" is such a frivolous thing. how do you just toss that out there like its worthless. its what got us into the playoffs last season! and AGAIN, what do you keep calling "great success"? receptions made? what's it matter if they aren't turning into any points, and in Mark's case, even FIRST DOWNS??

GTripp, you are absolitely tripping if you think Santana, Lloyd and ARE were brought here just for curls and screens. i swear all you care about is Mark's QB rating.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.08742 seconds with 10 queries