Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2009, 10:27 PM   #331
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
i never once mentioned that i watched the rams game did i? in fact.....i told you guys which games i did get to watch

no i didnt watch all of those games and no i had no idea i was going to be having this conversation....i dont watch the redskins like i watch the saints....i watch the redskins because its football......not to analyze them

you guys are clowns
1) a quick look back in the thread will reveal that you were repeatedly asked what games you had watched and you repeatedly dodged the question

2) if you do not watch the Redskins analytically, then why the heck are you wasting our time by sharing your analysis? Worse, why are you so arrogantly and inflexibly asserting the superiority of your analysis?

Please find another team site to plague.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-17-2009, 10:28 PM   #332
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
1) a quick look back in the thread will reveal that you were repeatedly asked what games you had watched and you repeatedly dodged the question

2) if you do not watch the Redskins analytically, then why the heck are you wasting our time by sharing your analysis? Worse, why are you so arrogantly and inflexibly asserting the superiority of your analysis?

Please find another team site to plague.
that's funny, he has all the stats but can't --won't-- name one game that he's watched.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 10:42 PM   #333
Zerohero
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
lol......ur silly
Wow after the Saints spectacular performance against the Rams i thought you would take a break from here. Please go on with your expert analysis.
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 10:55 PM   #334
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
feel free........blackandgold.com

or i could just tell you that his fumbles are costing the team points, field position, and momentum

he is very talented but his fumbles are very costly......bush has an issue with running up the hole....he tends to try and hit homeruns on every touch rather than just take what he can get.....because of it, he strikes out a lot by getting negative yardage and fumbles
In the few games that I've seen of New Orleans, Reggie Bush seemed fine to me. You are completely wrong. I mean he was drafted #2 overall in the 2006 draft. You're just being a Reggie Bush hater.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:31 PM   #335
CantonLegend
Special Teams
 
CantonLegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 131
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
1) a quick look back in the thread will reveal that you were repeatedly asked what games you had watched and you repeatedly dodged the question

2) if you do not watch the Redskins analytically, then why the heck are you wasting our time by sharing your analysis? Worse, why are you so arrogantly and inflexibly asserting the superiority of your analysis?

Please find another team site to plague.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
that's funny, he has all the stats but can't --won't-- name one game that he's watched.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
so really...you havent gotten to see many redskins games?

i dont live in saints TV area.....i do get to see the redskins because the browns cant manage to sell out their games and the redskins games have been against teams that do manage to sell out their games

like new york, atlanta and carolina
did i not say which games i watched? sorry....normally i would just talk slow so people like you can understand what im saying

i guess i could try to type it slower.....i guess

nnnnnnneeeeewwwwwwww yyyyyooooooorrrrrrkkkkkk, aaatttllllanntttaaa, and ccaaaarrrrooooooolllllliiiiiinnnnaaaa
CantonLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:31 PM   #336
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
i never once mentioned that i watched the rams game did i? in fact.....i told you guys which games i did get to watch

no i didnt watch all of those games and no i had no idea i was going to be having this conversation....i dont watch the redskins like i watch the saints....i watch the redskins because its football......not to analyze them

you guys are clowns
$5 says someone on this site is deathly afraid of clowns and nearly shat themselves when they saw this.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:31 PM   #337
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
In the few games that I've seen of New Orleans, Reggie Bush seemed fine to me. You are completely wrong. I mean he was drafted #2 overall in the 2006 draft. You're just being a Reggie Bush hater.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:33 PM   #338
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
did i not say which games i watched? sorry....normally i would just talk slow so people like you can understand what im saying

i guess i could try to type it slower.....i guess

nnnnnnneeeeewwwwwwww yyyyyooooooorrrrrrkkkkkk, aaatttllllanntttaaa, and ccaaaarrrrooooooolllllliiiiiinnnnaaaa
Well it takes slow person to know a slow person, I'm still waiting for your response to your last post about Betts.

Also, I still think you are wrong about Reggie Bush (no response on that either).
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:34 PM   #339
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
$5 says someone on this site is deathly afraid of clowns and nearly shat themselves when they saw this.
I didn't even dare click on the link. Some kids were afraid of monsters under their bed and the bogeyman in their closet...me? I was afraid of Ronald McDonald

By the way, speaking of the Saints. They signed Chris McAlister today and cut...Chase Daniel.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:35 PM   #340
CantonLegend
Special Teams
 
CantonLegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 131
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
In the few games that I've seen of New Orleans, Reggie Bush seemed fine to me. You are completely wrong. I mean he was drafted #2 overall in the 2006 draft. You're just being a Reggie Bush hater.
completely wrong? how so?

reggie has played pretty well with the exception of his fumbles.....tell me again why im wrong?

you're just trying to be facetious but you dont realize that i dont care how much you think you're making fun of me......your team is in shambles....the joke is on you
CantonLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:36 PM   #341
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
completely wrong? how so?

reggie has played pretty well with the exception of his fumbles.....tell me again why im wrong?

you're just trying to be facetious but you dont realize that i dont care how much you think you're making fun of me......your team is in shambles....the joke is on you
But I've seen a few games, how could that be wrong? You're just being a hater.


On a serious note, where's your response about my reply to your Betts post? I'm still waiting.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:44 PM   #342
CantonLegend
Special Teams
 
CantonLegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 131
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
The drop off in production for a RB is not just based on age, but age + number of carries. While Betts may be older than Portis, Betts has not had the same number of carries (and therefore the same amount of punishment) than Portis has. So in this particular fact that you are bringing up to "make your case" you are WRONG. Sadly, you'll just laugh it off and put more pictures of clowns or some other crap.
lol that was a sarcastic statement based on what your peers are offering up as suggestions for why portis is done.....hes too old.....

portis isnt too old.....there isnt an age limit to be a good running back in the league.....different factors result in decreases in production....i was merely trying to point out how foolish that argument is.....and you responded exactly how i expected thereby proving my point even further

Quote:
Well this is a naive simple-minded argument which I'll disprove, however I'm sure you'll laugh it off or something.

Many people are making the argument that Betts has made a more significant impact with his running this season than Portis has. While Portis (494 yds) may have more yards than Betts' 205 yds. (since he has played more games than Betts); Betts in two games has had a higher per game rushing yard average (4.1, 4.7) than Portis had in the first half of the season, and he has already doubled the number of TDs (2) that Portis scored (1).
once again....a sarcastic statement....the entire post was sarcasm bro

however, you are using 2 games to prove betts is better than portis?

Quote:
Ok, this is where you have to do this moronic thing of being specific about your claims and mention facts that support your argument. So allow me to make the provide the following information:

- Betts was drafted in the Spurrier regime in the 2nd round of the 2002 draft. A RB by the name of Stephen Davis was still the RB during that season.
- In 2003, the team brought Trung Canidate to be the RB (if memory serves me right), Betts only played 9 games that season and ran for 255 yds, almost half of what Canidate produced (600 yds) in 11 games.
- By 2004, Joe Gibbs decided to bring Portis in the blockbuster trade, Betts was a leftover from the Spurrier era.

Now Betts did have the chance to become the starter in 2006 when Portis went down with injury, and had a 1,174 yds season. However, this is when Portis was in his prime, and of course the team would not get rid of Portis at that stage.

So given this information, I don't understand where you see a situation where Betts was even given the chance to be the starter...save for 2006, in a year that he actually gave the front office a reason for him to be the starter.
betts has been in the league for 8 seasons and has cracked the starting lineup only a handful of times when the real starter has gone down with an injury.........

one thing im curious about tho....wouldnt the coaching staff put the best RB out on the field? if betts was better he would've started over portis.....he doesnt.....shouldnt that tell you something?
CantonLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:46 PM   #343
CantonLegend
Special Teams
 
CantonLegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 131
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
But I've seen a few games, how could that be wrong? You're just being a hater.
lol i guess you're right......i am a bush hater......ive always been a bush hater.....my g/f and ex g/fs will tell you that i've always hated bush......theres nothing good that ever came from a bush

Quote:
On a serious note, where's your response about my reply to your Betts post? I'm still waiting.
i can only post replies so fast.....the nonsense spewing from you guys is coming too fast and it takes me awhile to get to all of it

you will get your turn if you sit down and wait patiently.....until then just keep looking up at me with your puppy dog eyes
CantonLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:49 PM   #344
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
lol i guess you're right......i am a bush hater......ive always been a bush hater.....my g/f and ex g/fs will tell you that i've always hated bush......theres nothing good that ever came from a bush
So you are wrong about the fumbles. Wow, you can get a lot by watching just a handful of games.

Reggie Bush needs to get more carries, I mean the Saints picked him with the #2 for a reason. He looks superb in the handful of games I've watched.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:53 PM   #345
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
did i not say which games i watched? sorry....normally i would just talk slow so people like you can understand what im saying

i guess i could try to type it slower.....i guess

nnnnnnneeeeewwwwwwww yyyyyooooooorrrrrrkkkkkk, aaatttllllanntttaaa, and ccaaaarrrrooooooolllllliiiiiinnnnaaaa
Look, jerk, you were asked many times. You dodged the question repeatedly. You only produced that list under verbal duress. Then you treat us like we are the dicks?

And you continue to make grand claims about the 2009 Redskins despite seeing only a third of their games.

I've never asked for someone to be banned before but please ban this person.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.49280 seconds with 10 queries