Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WFT Free Agency

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Grade WFT's free agency haul so far (Fitz, Samuel, Jackson)
A 28 48.28%
B 26 44.83%
C 3 5.17%
D 1 1.72%
F 0 0%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2021, 08:40 AM   #1
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,178
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
What’s that?


Everett and one of these two...or both would big an ideal haul to improve playmaking ability on offense.
You give Fitz the following:

Terry
AG24
J.D M
Samuel
Thomas
Everett

That's a damn good offense
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 10:17 AM   #2
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,098
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
You give Fitz the following:



Terry

AG24

J.D M

Samuel

Thomas

Everett



That's a damn good offense


Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 10:30 AM   #3
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,593
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.
How come?
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:37 AM   #4
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,098
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by GridIron26 View Post
How come?


Simply haven’t seen enough. Showed flashes. Maybe durability.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:42 AM   #5
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Simply haven’t seen enough. Showed flashes. Maybe durability.
First full year playing RB, I think he did pretty well and will only get better
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:47 AM   #6
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
First full year playing RB, I think he did pretty well and will only get better
I also think he did well given how much teams focused on our running game and were not at all concerned about our passing game.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:48 AM   #7
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I also think he did well given how much teams focused on our running game and were not at all concerned about our passing game.
He showed more than enough to give him another go this year
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:24 AM   #8
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.
OK, Draft Najee Harris from Alabama and move Gibson back to WR.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:52 AM   #9
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.
10 starts
1000+ yards from scrimmage (795 rushing)
11 TDs

For someone who was basically a receiver in college, that's not too shabby.

I think we're in good hands at RB, but it's never a bad idea to add a complementary piece or two.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 02:31 PM   #10
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,098
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
10 starts

1000+ yards from scrimmage (795 rushing)

11 TDs



For someone who was basically a receiver in college, that's not too shabby.



I think we're in good hands at RB, but it's never a bad idea to add a complementary piece or two.


I really like AG no doubt but we never had a true consistent run game that moved the sticks or at the very least set us up for third and shorts. Gibson isn’t the problem but there is a problem there. Scheme? Oline? Another back to pair with AG? All three? Needs to be addressed. It will help the pass game. Teams just didn’t respect our run game at all last year.
AG could be an incredible weapon but we need to help him. Need some thunder with that lightning.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 05:32 PM   #11
Pervis_Griffith
Special Teams
 
Pervis_Griffith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 453
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
I really like AG no doubt but we never had a true consistent run game that moved the sticks or at the very least set us up for third and shorts. Gibson isn’t the problem but there is a problem there. Scheme? Oline? Another back to pair with AG? All three? Needs to be addressed. It will help the pass game. Teams just didn’t respect our run game at all last year.
AG could be an incredible weapon but we need to help him. Need some thunder with that lightning.

Could it be a very inconsistent passing game made it easier to play the run?

Consistency with the running game would be nice. I hope with a bolstered WR corp, and another TE to go with Thomas, we may suddenly find it easier to find running lanes.

Time will tell, I suppose.
Pervis_Griffith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2021, 08:19 AM   #12
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,098
Re: WFT Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervis_Griffith View Post
Could it be a very inconsistent passing game made it easier to play the run?



Consistency with the running game would be nice. I hope with a bolstered WR corp, and another TE to go with Thomas, we may suddenly find it easier to find running lanes.



Time will tell, I suppose.


I completely agree. They both feed off each other. To me it appeared our run game was the weaker of the two as hard as that is to believe. Lol. And yes another TE would do wonders.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.31137 seconds with 12 queries