Around the NFL: NFL Offseason

[BaltimoreSkins]

Hard to believe it took this long to accomplish this: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esp...3fplatform=amp

[Scalper]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Hard to believe it took this long to accomplish this: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esp...3fplatform=amp

The problem is that the science is emphatic. Mean Black IQ is about 1.1 standard deviations below the Caucasian mean. This is measure of central tendency for aggregates, not specific individuals, and everyone deserves equal civil rights regardless of IQ. Given that IQ scaling has an overall mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, this means (no lame pun intended) that mean Black IQ is about 83. Mean Caucasian IQ is 100, Asian about 105-107 (variation in different countries). This data reflects innate genetic differences in IQ of different races. I don't like these results, but they are hard science, which the liberal demonization like cultural bias cannot explain (tests have been given in every nation on Earth for over a century with same results EVERY time).

Science can be a harsh mistress. You don't always like the results. In this case, there isn't some big bad racist conspiracy, but rather a scientific attempt to help determine the cognitive decline players suffer from playing in the NFL. Without adjusting for race differences in IQ, this is impossible. When you assume higher IQs than actually exist for Blacks, to satisfy a pre-existing political philosophy, thereby ignoring basic science, you prevent identification of cognitive harm to black players. On the one hand, you don't want any NFL player not to receive help for the obvious and scientifically documented brain injury the sport causes, on the other hand, maybe people who ignore such obvious science, acting like 16th century mystics, deserve what they ask for. . .

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Scalper

The problem is that the science is emphatic. Mean Black IQ is about 1.1 standard deviations below the Caucasian mean. This is measure of central tendency for aggregates, not specific individuals, and everyone deserves equal civil rights regardless of IQ. Given that IQ scaling has an overall mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, this means (no lame pun intended) that mean Black IQ is about 83. Mean Caucasian IQ is 100, Asian about 105-107 (variation in different countries). This data reflects innate genetic differences in IQ of different races. I don't like these results, but they are hard science, which the liberal demonization like cultural bias cannot explain (tests have been given in every nation on Earth for over a century with same results EVERY time).

Science can be a harsh mistress. You don't always like the results. In this case, there isn't some big bad racist conspiracy, but rather a scientific attempt to help determine the cognitive decline players suffer from playing in the NFL. Without adjusting for race differences in IQ, this is impossible. When you assume higher IQs than actually exist for Blacks, to satisfy a pre-existing political philosophy, thereby ignoring basic science, you prevent identification of cognitive harm to black players. On the one hand, you don't want any NFL player not to receive help for the obvious and scientifically documented brain injury the sport causes, on the other hand, maybe people who ignore such obvious science, acting like 16th century mystics, deserve what they ask for. . .

Dude just no. No no no

Erase this

[Scalper]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Dude just no. No no no

Erase this

Why not just burn me at the stake?

Welcome to the new America.

Yeah, just censor any post you don't like and can't refute!

Pitiful.

I don't want anyone censored, especially views I detest the most.

You want me censored because you can't refute the scientific data presented.

Homey don't play that.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by Scalper

Why not just burn me at the stake?

Welcome to the new America.

Yeah, just censor any post you don't like and can't refute!

Pitiful.

I don't want anyone censored, especially views I detest the most.

You want me censored because you can't refute the scientific data presented.

Homey don't play that.

LOL. "I've been told to shut up on a football board, WE CANNOT SAY ANYTHING ANYMORE".
We have the same here, they want to be able to say anything, but if someone strongly disagrees and calls them out it's censorship.
(And no, I am not going to waste time deconstructing racist thought nor teach about social science on a football board, I come here for fun, I can turn French TV on for that kinda shit).

[Scalper]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

LOL. "I've been told to shut up on a football board, WE CANNOT SAY ANYTHING ANYMORE".
We have the same here, they want to be able to say anything, but if someone strongly disagrees and calls them out it's censorship.
(And no, I am not going to waste time deconstructing racist thought nor teach about social science on a football board, I come here for fun, I can turn French TV on for that kinda shit).

He specifically asked the post be removed because he disliked the content.
That is censorship.
All the other drivel ignored.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by Scalper

He specifically asked the post be removed because he disliked the content.
That is censorship.
All the other drivel ignored.

He advised you to erase it. It's common sense, not censorship.

[Scalper]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

LOL. "I've been told to shut up on a football board, WE CANNOT SAY ANYTHING ANYMORE".
We have the same here, they want to be able to say anything, but if someone strongly disagrees and calls them out it's censorship.
(And no, I am not going to waste time deconstructing racist thought nor teach about social science on a football board, I come here for fun, I can turn French TV on for that kinda shit).

My original response post was not racist, it presented scientific data on genetic IQ variations in different races, data I don't like and wish wasn't true, but which is factual. Presenting factual scientific data is not racism, and you can't deconstruct the basic data. I will fight these smears EVERY time they appear. I too prefer football smack talking, so let's get back to that. I will NEVER bring up politics first, but I also don't let reverse racism dressed up as progressivism slide. I am quarter Cherokee, grandmother 100% full blood, I am no lover of Caucasian atrocities, but Indians were harmed much more than blacks and nearly wiped from the Earth, so pardon me if I've not on board with the great black snivel-athon, blacks today blame everyone else for problems they create. Back to football.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by Scalper

My original response post was not racist, it presented scientific data on genetic IQ variations in different races, data I don't like and wish wasn't true, but which is factual. Presenting factual scientific data is not racism, and you can't deconstruct the basic data. I will fight these smears EVERY time they appear. I too prefer football smack talking, so let's get back to that. I will NEVER bring up politics first, but I also don't let reverse racism dressed up as progressivism slide. I am quarter Cherokee, grandmother 100% full blood, I am no lover of Caucasian atrocities, but Indians were harmed much more than blacks and nearly wiped from the Earth, so pardon me if I've not on board with the great black snivel-athon, blacks today blame everyone else for problems they create. Back to football.

Oh so you admit the rest of it was ?
"Hard science" man I ain't got time for you.
"Hard science"

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by Scalper

Why not just burn me at the stake?

Welcome to the new America.

Yeah, just censor any post you don't like and can't refute!

Pitiful.

I don't want anyone censored, especially views I detest the most.

You want me censored because you can't refute the scientific data presented.

Homey don't play that.

I will bite. A well done troll job. You want to see my response look in the debating with the enemy thread. I am not going to politicize the football threads my apologies everyone for my OP taking it down this rabbit hole.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Hard to believe it took this long to accomplish this: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esp...3fplatform=amp

To be honest I’ve never heard of the practice until this past week, but obviously this isn’t right.

[Scalper]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

To be honest I’ve never heard of the practice until this past week, but obviously this isn’t right.

Neurologists aren't Klansmen. You have to accurately measure cognitive decline to help people. Doing so without taking racial variations in IQ into account is impossible. If mean Black IQ is 83, but we assume it is 100, and then measure it as 83 or anything close, then EVERY African American qualifies for the monetary compensation. This is of course the whole point of the absurdity. You might argue every player should qualify, and I would agree, but that was not the settlement as negotiated. You can bet your ass that the blacks paid money won't use the bogus non-normed cognitive data when receiving treatment from neurologists.

I don't ever make political posts first, but I will not stand mute while reverse racism is dressed in the sheep's clothing of equality. The superficial appearance of things PR wise often differs dramatically from science.