AROUND THE NFL WEEK SB THREAD

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Giantone

MPO is around 12 for Barkley per for 3 years.

$12M a year would barely keep him in the top 10 highest paid backs. McCaffrey leads the pack at $16M per year, I'd start there.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

$12M a year would barely keep him in the top 10 highest paid backs. McCaffrey leads the pack at $16M per year, I'd start there.

He turned down a 12 mill per during the season

4 years 62-70 million. Giants eating up that cap

There is no way in this day and age I want to give 10 mill plus per RB

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

He turned down a 12 mill per during the season

4 years 62-70 million. Giants eating up that cap

There is no way in this day and age I want to give 10 mill plus per RB

they should go get pollard

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

He turned down a 12 mill per during the season

4 years 62-70 million. Giants eating up that cap

There is no way in this day and age I want to give 10 mill plus per RB

Rarely do teams get bang for their buck on a RB's second contract.

I'd definitely let him walk.

[Redskins247]

Originally Posted by MTK

Rarely do teams get bang for their buck on a RB's second contract.

I'd definitely let him walk.

You know it really sucks for RBs...you could argue their job is one of the hardest with the hits they take, and their shelf life is one of the smallest because of said hits. And there are some that are clearly better than most, but yet...that shelf life is still the same.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Redskins247

You know it really sucks for RBs...you could argue their job is one of the hardest with the hits they take, and their shelf life is one of the smallest because of said hits. And there are some that are clearly better than most, but yet...that shelf life is still the same.

I think he'll stay a Giant but there is a business side of things for sure. If he walks I can understand it .

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Redskins247

You know it really sucks for RBs...you could argue their job is one of the hardest with the hits they take, and their shelf life is one of the smallest because of said hits. And there are some that are clearly better than most, but yet...that shelf life is still the same.

there should be a hazard pay bonus and/or RBs picked in the first round should have a modified rookie contract; at best you are getting 5 good years out of a back