![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
|
Re: How Long For Brunell?
I cannot believe I am here defending #8.
Quote:
Eye Surgery Education Council Perhaps you would be happier with this team and their four Super Bowl trophies: The Official Website of the Indianapolis Colts The Steelers, Patriots, Bucs and Ravens all have recent SB rings without "game breakers" at QB. Perhaps you have forgotten what it has been like to have our QB losing game after game with stupid mistakes. I'm thrilled to see #8 throw that ball out of bounds instead of: -Sack -Penalty -INT -Fumble The passing game struggles last year cannot be hung on MB. He had one quality WR. Of course the passing game is going to struggle. Against MN, Betts kept putting us in 2nd and 3rd and long. The most important (and most overlooked) QB stat is TD/INT ratio. Last year, MB was 2/1. That is outstanding. It was a big reason why we were able to get into the playoffs even though we were not getting any major juice from the passing game. I feel like the Kevin Bacon character in Animal House yelling "Don't Panic!" in the middle of the riot. If we had Bledsoe, Collins, Plummer, Kitna, Frye, Losman, Brooks, Carr, Huard or Favre (yes, I said it -- he is one of the worst in the league right now) at QB, then I could understand the reaction. In fact, I would be in a state of panic as well. But we don't. I'd also like to point out that there are 10 NFL teams with really bad QBs starting for them this week. By comparison (and I can't believe I'm saying this), every Redskin fan should get down on their knees and thank god for #8.
__________________
"Lighten up, Sandy Baby." |
|
|
|
|
|
|