![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Campbell goes about his business and is quiet and respectful. Romo likes the spotlight. Gibbs knows how to control his players and keep them grounded. Only Riggins is a guy I can remember that was "high profile" for the Skins, because Gibbs likes quiet leaders. Romo seems like a good guy, but he's got a long way to fall if he fails now. These kids don't need that added pressure. You will NEVER catch Campbell doing what Romo did with those 6 turnovers. Trust me when I say Campbell is a better scrambler than Romo. He is extremely underrated in that catagory because he has a pass first attitude. He has all the elements of a great QB...with more experience, some day he will be great. Campbell does a lot of things that "wow" you, you just have to watch every week. I'm not saying Romo sucks or anything of the sort, I just feel he is overrated. People literally are (or were) putting him up there in the top 3 or 4 qbs. No way is he that good. His performance vs a terrible D proves it.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
oh no, not the Super Bowl predictions. Calm down dude, i don't want that type of thinking until mid - december.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think it is too early to say that Campbell will NEVER have such a bad game. True, maybe he won't have 5 INTs, but Romo is not the first nor the last, and I hope we both will be around long enough for me to remind you when Campbell has a really bad game. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Woops, my bad, it's Folk. Still got baseball on the brain or something. LOL.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
I am thoroughly enjoying your debate though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
About him being accurate. Well, I think he could be better, but this is the pot calling the kettle black. Campbell's comp% is 59.3%, Romo's is 59.1%. So if Campbell is inaccurate, so is Romo. Quote:
You seem to keep implying that Romo won the game for them, and that can't be farther from the truth. Your kicker won the game for you, and Romo did his best to lose the game for you. The other 21 players on the field won the game for you. The 11 on d, and the other 10 on offense. Romo did next to nothing to win that game on the whole. I know you want to think Romo did that last 2 drives, and technically, he did well on those two stretches, but you can't ignore ALL the other drives of the game. For all this, I still say he's not as good as people think he is. People think he's a top 3 or 4 QB, and he's barely a top 10-15, when it comes to total talent. I feel we're going to start to see him come back to earth. I will say this, if he carves up the Patriots, I'll change my tune about him. But I expect at least 2 int's from him, and the Cowboys will lose.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
I have no idea what you are talking about BigD, Campbell throws an excellent deep ball. That is what he truly excels at and I'm not being very biased here. He throws the deep ball better than most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Yes, very true. I remember seeing a stat somewhere that he leads the league in YPP. Or else I'm crazy.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
YPP does not mean "deep ball" threat. If you throw a screen pass and your RB takes it for 15 or 20 yards, it is all the RB, not the QB. Those stats are not as accurate as you might think. A west coast offense will have a better completion %, but a bad YPP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
I mean I don't know if you have watched the games or what, but he most definitely has had a HELL of a touch on his deep balls. I would say he probably completes 60-70% of his passes twenty yards plus downfield.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
I'm sure that stat is out there if someone knows where to look.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
I have seen him over throw Moss and other reciever many times. When was his last "deep ball" touchdown? Wasn't it with Caroline? And even that one, it was all Moss. I have not seen much from him this year, I think the number of deep passes probably equal the number of over thrown passes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
If 5 weeks was enough to decide who the pro bowl QBs should be, we'd have to put David Garrard on the AFC roster ahead of palmer. I'm not surprised that the media is overreacting, but there's a lot of football to be played. This is called "early varience." Wait until Romo's incompletions start getting picked (like in the Buffalo game). Completion %'s are through the roof leaguewide this year, and Romo has been very much below the league average. The INTS are going to come for him in bunches just like this last week. The touchdowns will also likely come in bunches, but if theres one thing I know it's that 1 TD does not equal 1 INT. I would guess it's closer to 2 TDs to one 1 INT.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension
Quote:
Brady, 1383 yards, 16 tds, 2 ints Manning, 1319 yards, 10 tds, 2 ints Anderson, 1251 yards, 11 tds, 8 ints Palmer, 1171 yards, 10 tds, 6 ints Roethlisberger, 1013 yards, 9 tds, 3 ints Garrard, 848 yards, 4 tds, 0 ints. Not sure who he would push out there, he needs to put up better numbers to be considered. Garrard is not making mistakes, but he's not playing the game to win either, he's playing not to lose. (not that there is anything wrong with that if it works, but it's rare that conservative QB's with low numbers make the pro bowl)
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|