Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Grade Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point
A 6 3.92%
B 68 44.44%
C 51 33.33%
D 24 15.69%
F 4 2.61%
Voters: 153. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2010, 02:27 PM   #16
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

^^ Upgrading the o-line is what LaVar & Dukes are discussing on 106.7 the fan at this very moment.

While I don't always agree with LaVar, a moment ago he took the words out of my mouth that I've been saying for years. Do what's needed to fix this line.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-04-2010, 03:23 PM   #17
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Upgrading the line in 1 year after years of neglect is unrealistic to say the least, especially when you consider the crop of free agents was very small this year due to the end of the cba. At least he got a LT w/his first pick & got some other o linemen later in the draft.

I'm expecting some kind of shakeup after the bye. I think Dock will be back at LG & maybe Rabach will be replaced. The latter is more a hunch. Also occured to me that we could see Hicks at RT before it's over!
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 03:41 PM   #18
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

I give the Coach a THUMBS UP as well.
I hope they enjoy a well deserved week off..........
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 03:59 PM   #19
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Upgrading the line in 1 year after years of neglect is unrealistic to say the least, especially when you consider the crop of free agents was very small this year due to the end of the cba. At least he got a LT w/his first pick & got some other o linemen later in the draft.

I'm expecting some kind of shakeup after the bye. I think Dock will be back at LG & maybe Rabach will be replaced. The latter is more a hunch. Also occured to me that we could see Hicks at RT before it's over!
I really don't care how long it takes, it's what has to be done if you want to see this team be successful. Prolong it and you'll continue to see your QB [regardless of who it is] trying to throw passes from his ass.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 05:11 PM   #20
LavaRnChad
Special Teams
 
LavaRnChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Re: Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
^^ Upgrading the o-line is what LaVar & Dukes are discussing on 106.7 the fan at this very moment.

While I don't always agree with LaVar, a moment ago he took the words out of my mouth that I've been saying for years. Do what's needed to fix this line.
I love their show. Lavar has been spot on about alot of things going on the Skins that he never gets credit for. Some of the things that Shanny is known to do, Lavar already pointed out months ago but some of us ripped him for it. Looks like he knows what he's talking about now though.
__________________
Lavar and B-Mitch speaks TRUTH. Larry Michael sucks and Joey T. is WACK! (Proud to be an inspiration to mooby) *BOOM!!! MNF proves my argument still LIVES!!!
LavaRnChad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 06:53 PM   #21
takethecake
Special Teams
 
takethecake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 37
Posts: 281
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Perhaps we could add a poll to this thread to rate Shanahan so far, A, B, C, D or F?
takethecake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 07:12 PM   #22
bigtee1975
Camp Scrub
 
bigtee1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

I didn't expect Shanahan to take this team to the promised land, or even make it to the play-offs in one season. In his first year with Denver he was 8-8 and took 3 seasons to win the SB, even with one of the all-time greatest QBs, so I can't expect higher expectations than that. The Skins are clearly more improved than last season with our weakest spot being the porous OL and our shaky core of receivers. I don't expect a coach to be flawless, though he expects his teams to perform flawlessly. He has a knack for spotting talent (Armstrong, Torain) and will continue to scout where no one else scouts, and pick up players that will perform. Next season we will be ready for greatness.
__________________
From the time I first picked up a football, I fell in love with this game. - James Arthur Monk
bigtee1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 06:04 AM   #23
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLee9718 View Post
I think Shanahan has made some adjustments to the offensive line, but that's not enough. He was supposed to upgrade the offensive line so the QB would have a decent chance to throw a pass without getting tramped on by every defensive line we face. Why is the offensive line just about the same as it was last year? Why don't we have capable backups on the line? And last, why don't we put somebody in for Casey Rabach, who can't block anybody?

Also, we had a better defense last year. With last year's defense, we could have been maybe 6-2 at this point, with wins over Houston and Detroit. If you throw in a win over the Rams, we could have been 7-1, with McNabb's best games yet to come. The defense was overwhelmed by the Colts and Manning, so we just lost that game regardless of how well we could have played.

Personally, I would have claimed Moss on waivers, but Moss probably wouldn't have liked to play for Shanahan.

So I give Shanahan a C-, and I think I'm being generous there. I think he deserves a D because he didn't do anything to upgrade the O-line. He thought he did, but bringing in different bodies, two of whom were reserves on other teams, just isn't enough to make a good O-line.
I disagree with just about everything you have said. Is Trent Williams not an upgrade? Jamaal Brown isn't as far along with his recovery as expected, but when healthy he's definitely an upgrade. Dockery hasn't worked out for whatever reason, but he was brought back to upgrade the interior. You can't overhaul the entire offensive line in one offseason. It takes at least two years and some good fortune with injuries and such.

The defense is in transition...Yeah, it was probably better last year, but it hasn't been horrible. We are on pace to have way more turnovers than last year, and if our offense could capitalize on them...this probably wouldn't even be much of a discussion. Again, when you change schemes (4-3 to 3-4) it takes time to acquire the right personnel to run that defense. That is why we haven't exclusively run the 3-4 this year...we've given up alot of yards, but I think that is part of the "bend don't break" concept...and for the most part I think that is working, but again the offense needs to capitalize on the TOs and the short fields. BTW, what defense doesn't have a hard time with Peyton Manning? And we had a chance to win that game...

I'm completely happy that we didn't make a move for Randy Moss. Why add someone mid-season that plays hard only when he wants to, that can't run routes very well, and that could potentially add more unnecessary drama to this locker room...we're good with what we have, the offense just needs to gel better which I expect to happen in the second half.

Other than the McNabb benching, I'm pleased with Shanahan. Even the McNabb benching, I'm ok with it, since I don't completely know everything that led to that...Shanahan doesn't owe me, you, or the media an explanation or the truth. As long as he's straight with the guys on the team, I don't care what he says...
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 07:17 AM   #24
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

I think its amazing what the Little General has done with this team. He doesnt have a lot of talent to work with but he has them better coached and better schemed and because of that they are a competitive team this year and that's something they havent been for a few years.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 08:37 AM   #25
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
I think its amazing what the Little General has done with this team. He doesnt have a lot of talent to work with but he has them better coached and better schemed and because of that they are a competitive team this year and that's something they havent been for a few years.
Wow! Who knew? I don't agree 100%, but for the sake of celebrating your optimism Irish, I concur.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 08:53 AM   #26
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,999
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
I think its amazing what the Little General has done with this team. He doesnt have a lot of talent to work with but he has them better coached and better schemed and because of that they are a competitive team this year and that's something they havent been for a few years.

I totally thought of this when you said that!



General Car Insurance.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 10:08 AM   #27
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

I have not read the article but from what I have seen MS reminds me of Tom Coughlin. He is a great coach but he needs to lern how to deal with players in tadays world and not like he did back in the 90's. I could see how he could loose the team like TC almost did a few years back.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 10:26 AM   #28
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,426
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

He's been solid. Should anyone around here complain? Especially after Zorn? As fans we always tend to bitch and moan. But the reality is this isn't a good football team. It's probably a below average football team so to be 4-4 is pretty good.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 12:57 PM   #29
Bushead
Impact Rookie
 
Bushead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 782
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLee9718 View Post
I think Shanahan has made some adjustments to the offensive line, but that's not enough. He was supposed to upgrade the offensive line so the QB would have a decent chance to throw a pass without getting tramped on by every defensive line we face. Why is the offensive line just about the same as it was last year? Why don't we have capable backups on the line? And last, why don't we put somebody in for Casey Rabach, who can't block anybody?

Also, we had a better defense last year. With last year's defense, we could have been maybe 6-2 at this point, with wins over Houston and Detroit. If you throw in a win over the Rams, we could have been 7-1, with McNabb's best games yet to come. The defense was overwhelmed by the Colts and Manning, so we just lost that game regardless of how well we could have played.

Personally, I would have claimed Moss on waivers, but Moss probably wouldn't have liked to play for Shanahan.

So I give Shanahan a C-, and I think I'm being generous there. I think he deserves a D because he didn't do anything to upgrade the O-line. He thought he did, but bringing in different bodies, two of whom were reserves on other teams, just isn't enough to make a good O-line.
You make it sound easy to replace all 5 people on the OL.
Bushead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 10:50 PM   #30
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Analyzing Mike Shanahan at the Midway Point

I grade hard but, gave him a C. 4-4 isn't bad but the outlook is dim. As soon as the Haynesworth tirad dies, McNabb's mud-slinging begins. I though Shanahan and Allen would bring in some talent but, not at the expense of making poor decisions while stepping on toes. Bringing in veteran competition for Portis was a joke. Starting Lictensteiger over Dockery is too. Galloway? Come on. And it was such a waste to bring in McNabb with no intention on re-signing him until he showed what he could do.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.40207 seconds with 13 queries