*Please read*

[Ruhskins]

I feel that there should be a 1000 post minimum before a user can start a thread.

While anyone can make the argument that the Niles Paul didn't belong in the Garcon/Morgan thread, it was already being discussed at length when the new thread was created.

People should make a quick test before creating a thread or posting breaking news...if it happened more than 3 hours ago, it is most likely being discussed in the forum.

You know how there's the whole "F*ck It I'm Going Deep" joke about Rex Grossman? I think some people here that go "F*ck It I'm Creating a Thread".

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I feel that there should be a 1000 post minimum before a user can start a thread.

While anyone can make the argument that the Niles Paul didn't belong in the Garcon/Morgan thread, it was already being discussed at length when the new thread was created.

People should make a quick test before creating a thread or posting breaking news...if it happened more than 3 hours ago, it is most likely being discussed in the forum.

You know how there's the whole "F*ck It I'm Going Deep" joke about Rex Grossman? I think some people here that go "F*ck It I'm Creating a Thread".

The Mods here do one hell of a job and it's not an easy one especially when you consider the topic is Redskins football something that in some case's has been passed down from one generation to another.
My question to Rushkins is why 1000,the poster will do it wether it's 500 or 2000 posts.If the poster makes a habit of it suspend his posting priviledges for a week or two.Just MHO but we all need to be a littlle more carefull,if that's all the mods want ,it's the least we can do.