WFT Free Agency

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Looking ahead: Washington still wants to sign a receiver and two names need to be watched -- Curtis Samuel and Marvin Jones. Washington tried to trade for Samuel last season. Both offer speed. Also, Washington wants to be mindful of Terry McLaurin's next contract when signing another receiver. If it breaks the bank on a receiver now, it could make it harder to retain McLaurin in the future. It also will look at tight ends. Gerald Everett is available; he fits what they desire (vertical threat).

KEIM

Sounds very logical.. I didn't realize we tried to trade for Samuel last year. If we sign Marvin Jones then we probably would need to find a replacement next year or 2 years later so I'm not fan of this part but wouldn't complain if we signed him.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Looking ahead: Washington still wants to sign a receiver and two names need to be watched -- Curtis Samuel and Marvin Jones. Washington tried to trade for Samuel last season. Both offer speed. Also, Washington wants to be mindful of Terry McLaurin's next contract when signing another receiver. If it breaks the bank on a receiver now, it could make it harder to retain McLaurin in the future. It also will look at tight ends. Gerald Everett is available; he fits what they desire (vertical threat).

KEIM

What’s that?


Everett and one of these two...or both would big an ideal haul to improve playmaking ability on offense.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

What’s that?


Everett and one of these two...or both would big an ideal haul to improve playmaking ability on offense.

You give Fitz the following:

Terry
AG24
J.D M
Samuel
Thomas
Everett

That's a damn good offense

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

You give Fitz the following:



Terry

AG24

J.D M

Samuel

Thomas

Everett



That's a damn good offense

Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.

How come?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.

OK, Draft Najee Harris from Alabama and move Gibson back to WR.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Maybe compared to last years offense. Lol. I am completely not sold on Gibson being our main back. Our o line still needs help too.

10 starts
1000+ yards from scrimmage (795 rushing)
11 TDs

For someone who was basically a receiver in college, that's not too shabby.

I think we're in good hands at RB, but it's never a bad idea to add a complementary piece or two.

[AnonEmouse]

Agreed, but as long as we can draft OL starters to give him time to find those weapons. And LB (and CB?) starters to stop the D backsliding. I'd now be looking to what we could get in FA to bolster LB and CB, at least for depth so we can draft 1-2 potential D starters.

[MTK]

If Mac Jones is there at 19 I'd let him slip another 19 spots and then pass over him again

If a supposed top QB makes it out of the top 10 he's probably not a real top QB

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by MTK

If Mac Jones is there at 19 I'd let him slip another 19 spots and then pass over him again

If a supposed top QB makes it out of the top 10 he's probably not a real top QB

Aaron Rodgers and Watson will disagree lol but I see what u are saying.

I don't think they will draft a QB in the 1st now.

[SkinsGuru]

Originally Posted by MTK

If Mac Jones is there at 19 I'd let him slip another 19 spots and then pass over him again

If a supposed top QB makes it out of the top 10 he's probably not a real top QB

like Aaron Rodgers?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SkinsGuru

like Aaron Rodgers?

Of course there are always exceptions but Mac Jones isn't Rodgers lol

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by MTK

If Mac Jones is there at 19 I'd let him slip another 19 spots and then pass over him again

If a supposed top QB makes it out of the top 10 he's probably not a real top QB

I don't follow the draft or college much so this post could be completely factually wrong and fake news. But I first saw Jones in a December game, and thought he might be good at 19. At that time it seemed like that was his positioning on draft boards, and then in short order he started creeping up into the top 10 in front of 1 or 2 other guys (Lance for 1). I think his natural spot is New England at 15ish though.

[Chico23231]

One thing about the Oline...I’m always down to give it attention. But center to right tackle is locked down in stone. Solid there.

The front office did well in attaining both Lucas and Schweitzer in Free agency who contributed on the left side and did better than expected. Add in Ismel and Charles in draft, young prospects who got some experience. Christian is a swing tackle...

We aren’t in bad shape, but obtaining another Tackle in the draft wouldn’t be a bad thing...but I’m not worried with Schreff locked in.

[vallin21]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

One thing about the Oline...I’m always down to give it attention. But center to right tackle is locked down in stone. Solid there.

The front office did well in attaining both Lucas and Schweitzer in Free agency who contributed on the left side and did better than expected. Add in Ismel and Charles in draft, young prospects who got some experience. Christian is a swing tackle...

We aren’t in bad shape, [B]but obtaining another Tackle in the draft wouldn’t be a bad thing[B]...but I’m not worried with Schreff locked in.

I agree. LT is our weak link on the O-Line. I’d prioritize adding a Tackle at 19 or Day 2. Sign a WR, then draft BPA at #19 (OT, CB, LB)