rooting for Goliath

Your insecurities are showing.

You've been digging at me. I tossed a line back at you and you crumple.

Ad Hominem attack.

Last I saw, however, I don't know of too many people who have used statistics to show that Santa Claus exists or that Elvis is dead (which, by the way, are factual issues, not matters of opinion that are supportable or not supportable by statistics).

I think you missed the point that there are many claims you might make which I could not disprove.

So, take your shot. Let me hear your logical argument.

Ad Hominem attack.

I plead not guilty: self-defense.

I think you missed the point that there are many claims you might make which I could not disprove.

So, take your shot. Let me hear your logical argument.

Well, one could prove that Elvis is dead by exhuming his body and matching his teeth to his dental records. But of course neither the family or any judge would go for that just to resolve this little dispute.

And if we're really going to try to debate the existence of Santa Claus, then things are really getting ridiculous around here. It's a pointless argument just for the sake of argument.

Your insecurities are showing.

You've been digging at me. I tossed a line back at you and you crumple.

Ok, so you obviously relish being a hypocrite? I can think of nobody on this site more insecure than you. The mere implication that you are wrong turns you into a name-calling child. Yet, you also want to call others holier-than-thou and try to come off as of some higher standard? Do you really not see this? Are you really that far off-base? Do you own a mirror?

I'd ask you how I "crumpled", but it's really not worth it, is it?

It's exactly this type of behavior that makes people dislike you. Actually, I don't want to speak for everyone else........it's what makes me dislike you (and make no mistake about it, I'm not mixing words here, I really do dislike you). When you learn how to argue and engage in debate at something above a 10th-grade level without name-calling, then come talk to me. Until then, I have no interest in getting into a pissing match with someone who actually believes that they cannot be wrong and fails to see the hypocracy of their own actions.

I plead not guilty: self-defense.

Logical fallacy.

Self defense applies to the American legal system, particularly when one feels an impending and reasonable threat, thereby justifying one to take action to prevent the said threat from being carried out.

You're assuming that calling names represents a threat and therefore justifies your actions in calling a name back. Calling someone a name in response does nothing to prevent any threats from being carried out.

Self Defense is used to prevent something from happening to you. That doesn't apply over a message board, you can't prevent anything.

Bring it on logic boy.

.

I think you missed the point that there are many claims you might make which I could not disprove.

So, take your shot. Let me hear your logical argument.

Like I said, when you grow up, I'll engage you. Furthermore, Matty locked the thread for a reason, and I'm not about to go over his head.

Besides, you've already made my point for me. By taking your position on statistics, you recognize that you will never be able to prove someone else's statments about a player's ability wrong.....so there's really nothing to argue about.

Logical fallacy.

Self defense applies to the American legal system, particularly when one feels an impending and reasonable threat, thereby justifying one to take action to prevent the said threat from being carried out.

You're assuming that calling names represents a threat and therefore justifies your actions in calling a name back. Calling someone a name in response does nothing to prevent any threats from being carried out.

Self Defense is used to prevent something from happening to you. That doesn't apply over a message board, you can't prevent anything.

Bring it on logic boy.

beat me to it.......beautiful post Schneed.

How about you go back and address my posts #71 and #73. I never heard your opinion, and since your opinions are always right, I'd like to know if I got these questions right on my test. I await your opinions.

You don't actually expect me to comment on your posts when you ask like a smartass do you?