if campbell doesn't start next week

Gibbs is a pu$$y...

I would encourage all those who think that Gibbs is a pussy to remeber that he did play Offensive Line for Don Coryell at San Diego State. He looks small next to the NFL players of today, but in person he is fairly imposing. If you have ever seen him standing next to Tony Stewart you will know what I mean. I would guess that Gibbs, even at his age, could probably beat the shit out of nearly everyone who has ever posted at this site. I KNOW he could beat the shit out of Czaban.

Saunders system????? Screw his stupid ass system! How about getting in the Qb in which you have 2 #1 picks invested in and having a smaller game plan. Then go in with a small game plan and EXECUTE THE PLAYS. I'm so tired of this 700 page playbook BS. The Colts run a basic offense. Wayne on the left and Harrison on the right and they don't use any motion. They just frickin execute better than anyone else. Of course having Manning doesn't hurt but I'm sure you people out there get my point.


For whatever it's worth he is the most familiar with it, in my mind he could not have done any worse than Brunnell, for this last thrashing we took. But from here out I do believe that Jason should be in at QB.

I felt that when they brought Saunders in it was yet another system that players where going to have to adjust to, breaking any consistancy in Gibbs system which got the Skin's to the playoffs.

I am sick of players having to adjust to a new coaching system every year or two.

I would encourage all those who think that Gibbs is a pussy to remeber that he did play Offensive Line for Don Coryell at San Diego State. He looks small next to the NFL players of today, but in person he is fairly imposing. If you have ever seen him standing next to Tony Stewart you will know what I mean. I would guess that Gibbs, even at his age, could probably beat the shit out of nearly everyone who has ever posted at this site. I KNOW he could beat the shit out of Czaban.

My mom could beat up bald ass Czaban.

i think it's assinine to blame this all on gibbs.gibbs came back because hew anted to bring the redskins back after all those bullshit years with norv turner,and steve spurrier who did'nt really know shit about pro football.he gives them the best chance to win since he left in 1993.i'd like to see some changes,JC at qb.blitz more,but gibbs has put 3 years into this,and think out of respect,he at least deserves the next two seasons to at least try and do it!and like i said,if you bring a new coach,the team's gonna suck the next 3 years so let the man finish what he started.


It's not assinine at all. He doesn't give us the best chance to win. He may not call the plays anymore but his handprints are all over the game plan. I mean this is basically a high school offense we are running. I have never seen such a conservative approach to NFL offensive football. The rules BEG YOU TO THROW IT DOWNFIELD. Yet we still run these 3 yard passes when it's 3-10. He is out of touch with today's game. He has handled the whole Jason C. situation very poorly. It's not 1985 and you don't leave high draft picks on the bench for two years. He is coddling Jason C. like he did Rypien and Humphries. Campbell can handle the pressure. He played 4 years in the SEC. Why isn't Rocky M. playing over Holdman? Two second round draft picks invested in him and they still play Holdman. For what? Plus you don't bring in a gazillion free agents every year and expect it to work. YOU CAN'T BUY TEAM CHEMISTRY. What other NFL coach does this crap? And he's so hard headed. The only reason we are running shotgun is becasue of Bill Mustgrave.

Yes, Gibbs is way too loyal to Brunell. Sadly, Gibbs' loyalty to him has made this a wasted season. And I'm not saying it's all Brunell's fault. The defense has been very disappointing, and it would be bad with or without Brunell. But, by starting Brunell this deep into it, we wasted a good chance to see whether JC is the future. I've said it all season: Jason Campbell could have started out 2-5 or 3-6 - just like wily veteran Brunell - and had half a season under his belt.

Yes, Gibbs is way too loyal to Brunell. Sadly, Gibbs' loyalty to him has made this a wasted season. And I'm not saying it's all Brunell's fault. The defense has been very disappointing, and it would be bad with or without Brunell. But, by starting Brunell this deep into it, we wasted a good chance to see whether JC is the future. I've said it all season: Jason Campbell could have started out 2-5 or 3-6 - just like wily veteran Brunell - and had half a season under his belt.

Great point!

Did anyone watch Gibbs' post-game press conference? He seemed to imply that he was going to stick by Brunell. Sorry, I can't quote him.

Your correct. Gibbs likes the vets. But this is getting absurd. If I were D. Snyder I would DEMAND that Jason play next week or your fired. Personally I'm getting so sick and tired of Gibbs act. Honestly I hope he leaves after this year. He is a soft coach now. The conservative game plans and the horrible personal moves are bad enough. Then when they stink up the joint he comes on TV and says were all in it togehter and we have a lot of fight and character. What a bunch of bullshit. Go tell that crap to your wife. But don't tell it to the fans. You are what your record is and that's not very good. And even if they start Campbell do you honestly think the game plan will change? They are still going to call 30 screen plays a game and try and baby him.
i like reading all the input but, i don't want snyder making the decisions over who is playing positions. today, and this season has sucked but let's not bash gibbs. he deserves better.

Did anyone watch Gibbs' post-game press conference? He seemed to imply that he was going to stick by Brunell. Sorry, I can't quote him.
Not sure, I heard someone ask about the QB situation and I can just remember him saying he wasn't going to address it.

Not sure, I heard someone ask about the QB situation and I can just remember him saying he wasn't going to address it.

I just read Jason LaCanfora's blog and he seemed to think Gibbs implied that he was probably going to stick with Brunell.