dmek25
08-13-2007, 03:08 PM
no way. they had problems last season with trying to stop the run. and now they want to get rid of Warren? all kinds of red flags should be going up. just remember back to them trying to trade AL Wilson
Gerard Warren on the trading block!!dmek25 08-13-2007, 03:08 PM no way. they had problems last season with trying to stop the run. and now they want to get rid of Warren? all kinds of red flags should be going up. just remember back to them trying to trade AL Wilson T.O.Killa 08-13-2007, 03:37 PM I keep hearing that Golston is small, he out ways Montgomery(6-4 320). He was small, not anymore. GTripp0012 08-13-2007, 04:08 PM I keep hearing that Golston is small, he out ways Montgomery(6-4 320). He was small, not anymore.Unless though, he completely changes the way he approches the game, its not going to make a difference. I think the added weight is going to hurt Golston because he won't be as quick as he was last year. I don't expect him to improve against the run. I do expect to see some of Anthony Montgomery this year. chrisl13 08-13-2007, 04:21 PM I'll pass on this trade. Dont u understand that we're trying to "develop" Gholston and Montgomery. They cant develop if they dont get in the game. Man I swear as soon as someone is on the trading block or released to free agency u guys are so quick for the redskins to sign them. Didnt u learn from the Archuleta deal? Duh. BleedBurgundy 08-13-2007, 04:25 PM Here's the best possible Week 1 Starting D Line--- LE-MichaelStrahan DT-Tank Johnson DT-Gerard Warren RE-Simeon Rice This makes too much sense not too happen. (sarcasm) sandman89 08-13-2007, 04:30 PM Ya,But all there asking for is a 5th round pick or a 6th.Maybe Warran doesn't like the Broncos and i say lets get Warren.Hes a upgrade and if he does suck than we have nothing to lose at all we just wasted a low Pick for him.And if he does suck or act out than goldston would start so either way we have a good situation for this. kdogg3270 08-14-2007, 01:13 PM I'll pass on this trade. Dont u understand that we're trying to "develop" Gholston and Montgomery. They cant develop if they dont get in the game. Man I swear as soon as someone is on the trading block or released to free agency u guys are so quick for the redskins to sign them. Didnt u learn from the Archuleta deal? Duh. exactly what this person said...please do not sign this guy. Gettin' Pinkston was bad enough mmil12 08-14-2007, 01:54 PM I read that we were interested in him as well according to espn.com. As much as I feel that he could be a major asset to us this year and years to come, I'm not willing to sacrafic several draft picks for him. Oh, and we all know, when we deal with Denver in a trade its going to be a mid to late round pick. They got the better of us in the Champ for Portis deal already...why are we going to help them again? Also, if you read his contract it increases dramatically over the nest three seasons from 595,000 this year to 4.5 mil to 4.8 and so on. That's a lot of money for a guy who couldn't stay on Clevelands rosters. EARTHQUAKE2689 08-14-2007, 06:25 PM The Denver Post - Warren trade seems imminent (http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_6617034) Looks like we are a big potential suitor skinsfan_nn 08-14-2007, 06:52 PM That picture of Wamsee sure does look fimiliar........the poor kid, thats just how he looked under spurrier. Isn't ever player cut or being traded rumored to be a SKIN? |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum