MTK
02-08-2008, 03:24 PM
Oh I read it. I'm just commenting in general that some people won't give up on him no matter what.
Brandon LloydMTK 02-08-2008, 03:24 PM Oh I read it. I'm just commenting in general that some people won't give up on him no matter what. FRPLG 02-08-2008, 03:27 PM He is greatly disliked amongst his teammates. I seriously doubt they'll keep him around after he has sat around and stolen pay checks for some years now AND everyone hates him. FRPLG 02-08-2008, 03:30 PM If I remember correctly the players cheered for him last year when he finally caught a ball. I'm not so sure that he is hated so much by the players. He is. I have heard it straight from the mouth of more than 3 players. He has NONE, ZERO, ZILCH support amongst players. Them cheering for him was more of a sarcastic gesture after they did everything in the world to help build up his confidence and get him involved and he went and crapped all ove them. jrocx69 02-08-2008, 03:33 PM Oh I read it. I'm just commenting in general that some people won't give up on him no matter what. cool, just stating i never wanted the douche and still dont, yet i thought it would be a good subject to talk about given the circumstances in the front office and his high cap number ChuckPrez 02-08-2008, 03:34 PM That worked out like a lead balloon. Actually the Mythbusters made a lead balloon work just fine. Sheriff Gonna Getcha 02-08-2008, 03:55 PM I think I've made my views of Brandon Lloyd known (http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locker-room/16193-lack-of-receiver-production.html?highlight=Brandon+Lloyd#post256002 ) for quite some time. I thought he was a jackass then, I think he is one now, and I think he will probably always be one. mheisig 02-08-2008, 04:40 PM Actually the Mythbusters made a lead balloon work just fine. And we all know that everything on Mythbusters is scientifically accurate. I mean how could two guys with backgrounds in Hollywood special effects and model building possibly NOT be scientifically accurate? We all know that Hollywood special effects follow a strict scientific approach. redwagonskins 02-08-2008, 06:39 PM The funny thing about Lloyd is he was a pretty economical WR in SF. His 2004 salary was $306,000 and he caught 6 TDs for a average price of $51,100 a TD. (http://biz.stats.com/images/WSJ_091505.pdf). That made him the 6th most valuable player in terms of $ per TD that year. Fast forward to 2007, his salary (base) is $595,000 for a grand total of 0 TDs. I'm no math genius but I think that is a significant decrease in value. I kind of wish the guy was salvageable (as in he's "see the light", straighten up, and work out hard) but I have to believe he is cap casualty #1 and we'll see him trying to rap on some MTV spring break special. Or being one of the "Joes" on Joes v. Pros. redduke44 02-08-2008, 07:10 PM NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! is he actually that expensive to keep? By cutting him, we'd have to pay out the rest of his signing bonus this year right? while I too am sick of him, perhaps a new head coach, system, coordinator, etc may be able to find some use... diehardskin2982 02-08-2008, 09:13 PM I honestly think that Lloyd was never given a chance here. He may have been a victim of the offense war between Gibbs and Saunders. Gibbs had the ultimate say of who got on the field ya know... Lloyd will be gone to STL. we have to make room to get Ocho Stinko |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum