Vinny tips his hand on the final 53

Whomever called me a dimwit before. Should realize the reason we signed Aldridge today? it wasn't because Betts or Rock were that awesome. Is that egg on your face or your foot in your mouth?

What? That didn't make sense.

Besides...Robert Henson isn't a member of this site, dimwit :)

What? That didn't make sense.

Besides...Robert Henson isn't a member of this site, dimwit :)

It does mean sense. Because Neither Betts or Cartwright are doing squat. Betts can catch a screen pass that's it. So why do we sign Aldridge? Why was Mason gtting some rushes the other game. Just put one and two together and stop being cynical. Dimwit :)

It does mean sense. Because Neither Betts or Cartwright are doing squat. Betts can catch a screen pass that's it. So why do we sign Aldridge? Why was Mason gtting some rushes the other game. Just put one and two together and stop being cynical. Dimwit :)

I see. So what you're saying is we signed Alridge to replace Betts or Cartwright?

:doh:

I love look at me, pat myelf on the back posts, especially when they make no sense.

:doh:

what? That didn't make sense.

Besides...robert henson isn't a member of this site, dimwit :)

lmao!

:doh:

I love look at me, pat myelf on the back posts, especially when they make no sense.

:doh:

NO it aint look at me pat me on the back posts. It makes total sense. You just dont want it to make sense.

Question: Why would we sign Aldridge if the RBs we had were producing?

Its not pat me on the back post. its more like redemption for me being calle da dimwit and knowing nothing.

If Betts was doing his job and if Rock was able to come in a serve as a RB and do the things the team needed Aldridge woulndn't have been signed. Its a simple as that.


You two and a few others have a habit of ganing up on people on ths baord you dont agree with. Because you two think you are the wizards of Redskins football. We are not goign to keep all these backs. If Aldrige and Mason both get rushign attempts next game or more involved in the offense. Betts or Rock will be gone. becauthey are only taking up Roster space because we have other people who can do their jobs. We need a OL. I rather us let one of them go when we have 5 backs and Betts is not producing and Rock isn't anything special on ST. So if we need a OL someone has to go. it might not be now. But it might be in the near future. But ofcourse this doens't make sense either. But to me nothing will unless you and your cronies say it.

Yawn.

Whatever.

What? That didn't make sense.

Besides...Robert Henson isn't a member of this site, dimwit :)

This doesn't make any sense. Very corny!! I know you are referring to the tweet he sent. But a member of this forum called me a dimwit because I said we need to keep Mason and another back (either Alridge or Dorsey).

Yawn.

Whatever.

So you took the time to type "Yawn. Whatever". That says it all. Great comeback Narcissist!!

So you took the time to type "Yawn. Whatever". That says it all. Great comeback.

Yes, it took me a while but I managed to come up with a brilliant response to an equally brilliant "look at me" post.

Aldridge is not on the team because someone is not doing their job, it's because Thomas went down and a roster spot opened up, and Aldridge was someone that Vinny liked and he was really close to being the 53rd man on the roster a few weeks ago. So the opportunity presented itself to bring him back. Simple as that, no need to look any further.

If it had something to do with Betts or Rock, why are they still on the roster?