GTripp0012
09-13-2009, 07:38 PM
It's hard to win when the qb throws an interception putting the opposing team in great field position (eventually leading to a td) AND fumbles, which is returned for a td.
That's 14 out of 23 points that Campbell's mistakes directly can be blamed for. There's no excusing that.Um. No. Things don't work like this.
If you want to use expected points, you can only put 3 on Campbell per INT. I mean, hell, they didn't even score off that turnover. You can dock him something for the fumble as well, but remember that he's not necessarily responsible for the recovery or the tackle, especially after the sack.
If Campbell turned the ball over no times, we might have saved 7 points. But a lot of that's just circumstance.
I'm fully aware the defense didn't give up 7 of those 23 points. But they also didn't let the offense on the field for the majority of the first half. That's on them.
I agree. Samuels got beat, but Campbell never gave him a chance.
JC did not step up on numerous plays........rookie stuff. We are lucky it wasn't more serious
Redskin Warrior
09-13-2009, 07:39 PM
It's hard to win when the qb throws an interception putting the opposing team in great field position (eventually leading to a td) AND fumbles, which is returned for a td.
That's 14 out of 23 points that Campbell's mistakes directly can be blamed for. There's no excusing that.
I put that pick on Moss he has to comeback to the ball or swat the ball down the fumble is 100% JC.
budw38
09-13-2009, 07:39 PM
The O-Line stunk , the billion $$$$ man did nothing special and Landry and Hall stunk in coverage . Next up ,,,, the LAMS ,,,, 1-1-0
firstdown
09-13-2009, 07:40 PM
i actually dont feel that bad. Bullshit turnovers. I thought Campbell looked pretty decent
Did you actually see the game?
GTripp0012
09-13-2009, 07:40 PM
Did you actually see the game?Did you?
Eknox
09-13-2009, 07:42 PM
The interception was on the other end of the field, they were actually driving when he threw the pick. I really though Tana could have made a better attempt at coming back to the ball, the Giant CB sure did!
I think Campbell should have taken the yards instead of forcing it to a covered receiver. Just think if he had taken care o the ball we win..I still haven't given up on him, but wow he looked like Stafford (Lions QB) confused.
firstdown
09-13-2009, 07:42 PM
Um. No. Things don't work like this.
If you want to use expected points, you can only put 3 on Campbell per INT. I mean, hell, they didn't even score off that turnover. You can dock him something for the fumble as well, but remember that he's not necessarily responsible for the recovery or the tackle, especially after the sack.
If Campbell turned the ball over no times, we might have saved 7 points. But a lot of that's just circumstance.
I'm fully aware the defense didn't give up 7 of those 23 points. But they also didn't let the offense on the field for the majority of the first half. That's on them.
What it was the O that kept the D on the field most of the game. The 7 points was on JC and the fact he has no clue how to use the pocket. He freaking rols right into 1/2 of his sacks.
GTripp0012
09-13-2009, 07:43 PM
I think Campbell should have taken the yards instead of forcing it to a covered receiver. Just think if he had taken care o the ball we win..I still haven't given up on him, but wow he looked like Stafford (Lions QB) confused.He should have run the ball. Especially since he seemed to change his mind in the middle of the run.