Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12

hail_2_da_skins
07-27-2011, 10:47 AM
Another sign that the Fat Albert fiasco end is near.

musicmaster45
07-27-2011, 10:52 AM
I think we are trying to he almost two sets of good D linemen

Carriker Bryant Jenkins (J)
Coefield Gregg/Neild Jenkins (C)

skinsfan69
07-27-2011, 10:59 AM
I like this move. He's an upgrade over anyone we currently have on the DL.

SOUL-SKINS
07-27-2011, 11:00 AM
I like this move. He's an upgrade over anyone we currently have on the DL.

Agreed...............If we sign Cullen Jenkins......not too shabby of a Dline

MTK
07-27-2011, 11:01 AM
I'm seeing a theme along the DL - versatility

skinsfan69
07-27-2011, 11:07 AM
Don't want to be a debbie downer but I feel like this could be another Shanahan arrogance decision making something work that may not..

I agree but hopefully they'll put the guy in good positions to get after the QB. But if they put him at NT then terrible move. Cofield is not a NT.

musicmaster45
07-27-2011, 11:07 AM
Exactly Matty allows for the amoeba defense to work super well

Monkeydad
07-27-2011, 11:11 AM
Good signing ,sorry to lose him but the Giants are going younger and cheaper.Dumped a bunch of O linemen yesterday.

Younger? Cofield is 27.

SOUL-SKINS
07-27-2011, 11:14 AM
Younger? Cofield is 27.

He's just bitter

skinster
07-27-2011, 11:15 AM
Younger? Cofield is 27.

I think he means younger AND cheaper. The giants apparantly have guys they think will fill in well that are still in their rookie contracts. Not that Cofield is old, but the giants just have other priorities of where to spend their money, and would prefer to replace cofield with young/cheep talent and spend the money elsewhere.

In general the Giants do seem to be getting younger, of course not 100% of their moves will reflect that (like when I believe they will give Osi a big contract).

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum