Preseason Predictions Thread

Another year, another overrated Dallas team. What else is new?

At every position group on offense, starter to depth, Redskins > Cowboys. Defense group, more even.

At every position group on offense, starter to depth, Redskins > Cowboys. Defense group, more even.Receiver to Dallas, I think. Tight end up for grabs. In a 1 TE offense, you'd take Witten. Multiple TEs, you want the Redskins.

Receiver to Dallas, I think. Tight end up for grabs. In a 1 TE offense, you'd take Witten. Multiple TEs, you want the Redskins.

WR is def the place where its the closest, but Id still go with the Skins. I think you look at the group at TE, no question its the Skins. Think Fred is gonna get that contract this year.

The thing is, when you factor in how difficult the Redskins are to prepare for as opposed to the Cowboys, it's easy to say that the Redskins offense is far and beyond Dallas'. And it is.

I'm sure you could get a list of 8-10 teams who have the same top end talent as Dallas...just not in the NFC East.

Denver, New Orleans, Atlanta, Tampa, Green Bay, Seattle, SF, Houston, maybe New England?

I neither agree nor disagree with the assertions you make based on this undefined "top end talent" though I suspect once defined I will likely disagree. Given undefined nature of the phrase, however, it is impossible to do so coherently. Please ennumerate who you consider to be Dallas's "top end talent" - preferably in the order you think they rate.

Bryant/Austin > Garcon/Morgan in terms of talent. But our WR depth is better.

There's no question that the Redskins are best in the division at OL (given 100% health for all four teams), RB, QB, and near the top at TE. That's most of an offense right there, and it's why I'm so optimistic about our offense this year.

The defensive depth is better than it was last season, which is saying something, but we're very weak right up the middle of the defense. A place to keep an eye on. Because I think we're strong enough on the edges to have a really good defense.

Bryant/Austin > Garcon/Morgan in terms of talent. But our WR depth is better.Yes. The Cowboys bench receivers are notoriously bad at coming into a game and not screwing up. They hang the QB out to dry so much.

I neither agree nor disagree with the assertions you make based on this undefined "top end talent" though I suspect once defined I will likely disagree. Given undefined nature of the phrase, however, it is impossible to do so coherently. Please ennumerate who you consider to be Dallas's "top end talent" - preferably in the order you think they rate.

Sure thing, glad you asked.

Ware, Spencer, Lee, Romo, Bryant, Witten, Tyron Smith, Hatcher, and Carr would fit my definition of top end talent. Austin, Murray, Ratliff, Claiborne, and Bruce Carter would fall short.