is the NFL shady or legit ?

Fixed by organized crime?
How would they go about fixing it?

lol this thread

Fixed by organized crime?
How would they go about fixing it?

It seems pretty easy by getting a player or a ref to "miss" a play or 2. Its not like it has to be every play, just 1 or 2 can easily turn a game. Someone like Aaron Hernandez would be a prime candidate for this considering all the shady people he seemed to be hanging around with. Its not like it hasnt been done in other sports. I am stunned by the naivete of the people on this board who think that game fixing is impossible.

I dont think it happens often but I do think it happens occasionally.

It's not impossible to fix a game, but I think it's next to impossible to keep it covered up.

I think some of you dismissed this way too quickly. The NFL being fixed is unlikely, but it isn't implausible. I'd like to hear the arguments refuting all the evidence Ram29 brought out, besides it being too "hard to cover up" to be plausible.

The NFL as entertainment instead of sport? That's the part that really makes me mad. The NFL doesn't give a rat's ass about preserving the game or the integrity of it... all they care about is making money. That's why we have all these stupid rule changes like practically(and it will happen completely soon) eliminating the kickoff.

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/5e/5e6116694147369871eda4b177afec9ad0dce249c30070c349 52716e7d639098.jpg

I think some of you dismissed this way too quickly. The NFL being fixed is unlikely, but it isn't implausible. I'd like to hear the arguments refuting all the evidence Ram29 brought out, besides it being too "hard to cover up" to be plausible.

The NFL as entertainment instead of sport? That's the part that really makes me mad. The NFL doesn't give a rat's ass about preserving the game or the integrity of it... all they care about is making money. That's why we have all these stupid rule changes like practically(and it will happen completely soon) eliminating the kickoff.

Its from two sources that are credible how?
Anyone can make a blog and start caterwauling.
I started to read it and stopped.
It reminds me of the "9/11 was an inside job" blogs.
Its speculation.
Show me a confession or a conviction.
*Insert large roll eyes icon here*

It's like asking someone to refute the "evidence" that we didn't land on the moon. C'mon man.

Its from two sources that are credible how?
Anyone can make a blog and start caterwauling.
I started to read it and stopped.
It reminds me of the "9/11 was an inside job" blogs.
Its speculation.
Show me a confession or a conviction.
*Insert large roll eyes icon here*

Sure, but if they make good arguments, that's a moot point.

I haven't dug deep enough for evidence of my own because I don't think it's true and it's never bothered me that much. I just wanted compelling arguments from those who immediately said it was ridiculous.

It's like asking someone to refute the "evidence" that we didn't land on the moon. C'mon man.

Here's Your Proof that We Did, in Fact, Land on the Moon - weather.com (http://www.weather.com/news/moon-landing-proven-20130123)

See, that's how this game is played. :D

Problem is no matter what evidence is offered, the mouth breathers will come up with new BS or just flat out deny the truth. That's how the conspiracy theory game works.