NFL conference championship weekend

Do OT exactly like college, and anything should be reviewable. Enough with a coin toss deciding shit.

In all fairness, a coin toss didn't decide anything.

Although, an actual coin toss to decide who wins an overtime game (like actually decide) would be pretty interesting.

This OT stuff is out of hand, the only reason people want a change is because NE won, if KC had won the game after getting the ball first this much would not be said.

The Saints got the ball first and the Rams stepped up and stopped them, it's football. The league already changed the rule to scoring a TD first wins the game..

Stop trying to change the rules every damn season, so what is next? Teams have to score twice to win?

In all fairness, a coin toss didn't decide anything.

Although, an actual coin toss to decide who wins an overtime game (like actually decide) would be pretty interesting.

this...I have no problem with the ot rules. people need to stop bitching about, stop the pats and get the ball back.

In all fairness, a coin toss didn't decide anything.



Although, an actual coin toss to decide who wins an overtime game (like actually decide) would be pretty interesting.



If you have two high powered offenses, and the coin toss decides which teams offense gets the ball first - it absolutely plays a hand in the outcome. It is stupid. College OT rules are fair. That is how it should be done imo.
Edit: this has nothing to do with the Pats. Ive wanted the college OT since college started it. Leave nothing on the table.

Do you really want to see a game end 65-62?



I don't



How many games go into OT? Not like it happens all the time. If it does though than im all for it. Imagine if in tennis they did a coin flip to see who served for the win?
Remember you have to start going for 2 also. You could even eliminate extra points entirely. Would shorten it somewhat.

This OT stuff is out of hand, the only reason people want a change is because NE won, if KC had won the game after getting the ball first this much would not be said.

The Saints got the ball first and the Rams stepped up and stopped them, it's football. The league already changed the rule to scoring a TD first wins the game..

Stop trying to change the rules every damn season, so what is next? Teams have to score twice to win?

I disagree. I think Pats fans would be losing their SHIT over it.

I still stand by this, play a five minute OT like normal football until there's a winner. I don't think games would end up like college football when you're not starting on the twenty five (thirty five?) yard line.

I'm rooting for NE only because if they win they will have more SBs than Dallas, that would put Dallas tied for 3rd most, sounds better than 2nd most.

Sounds to me that you root more for a team to lose, than for your team to win. You're a strange human.....

I can't help but to keep thinking that just a few short years ago, Washington had not one of the best, but.... THE best young stud head coaches in their organization and let him walk.....

So I guess I am a strange human too....

Sounds to me that you root more for a team to lose, than for your team to win. You're a strange human.....

I can't help but to keep thinking that just a few short years ago, Washington had not one of the best, but.... THE best young stud head coaches in their organization and let him walk.....

So I guess I am a strange human too....

No bro I just hate dallas lol

KC should have a chance to get the ball once I feel. But they did have a chance to stop the Pats and they couldn't.

One minute the Pats can spread you out and be a pass happy team, and then the next go back to an I formation ( WITH A FULLBACK GRUDEN, YOU DUMMY) roll up their sleeves and run it right down your throat. In that aspect they remind me of how things use to be around here.

It sounds like people just want a skills competition between Brady and Mahomes instead of a football game.

The Chiefs D gave up 3 TDs to the Patriots in the final 3 drives.
Do we really need to see more of that?