NFL conference championship weekend

I don’t even know what we’re talking about anymore.

I thought the argument was the coin flip decides the game? (The numbers prove otherwise)

Now it’s not fair because one team might get two possessions vs one?

You’re moving the goalposts on this.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t even know what we’re talking about anymore.

I thought the argument was the coin flip decides the game? (The numbers prove otherwise)

Now it’s not fair because one team might get two possessions vs one?

You’re moving the goalposts on this.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Never said it decides the game. Said it helps.
Im saying the same thing i was before. Just expounding on it.
Team A gets ball and scores TD. Over.

VS

Team A gets ball and gets stopped
Team B gets ball and gets stopped
Team A gets ball and scores. Over.

Same shit one team had two chances, and one team had one.
Look obviously you guys do not feel as strong as me about this. NC sort of did but than went away and left me on an island. Lol.
I think my baseball extra innings argument is a good one though. Both teams play offense and defense until one team scores more than the other. Should be the same way but as usual football gotta be different.

Never said it decides the game. Said it helps.
Im saying the same thing i was before. Just expounding on it.
Team A gets ball and scores TD. Over.

VS

Team A gets ball and gets stopped
Team B gets ball and gets stopped
Team A gets ball and scores. Over.

Same shit one team had two chances, and one team had one.
Look obviously you guys do not feel as strong as me about this. NC sort of did but than went away and left me on an island. Lol.
I think my baseball extra innings argument is a good one though. Both teams play offense and defense until one team scores more than the other. Should be the same way but as usual football gotta be different.

Sorry but this is getting retarded. At some point the game has to end. 80% of the time both teams have an offensive possession so what's the big deal??

What is your "fair" way of doing OT?

Sorry but this is getting retarded. At some point the game has to end. 80% of the time both teams have an offensive possession so what's the big deal??

What is your "fair" way of doing OT?



I feel like im beating a dead horse but you keep asking what i meAn. Lol. So here i go again.
Each team gets the ball until one team scores more than the other does in a particular split possession series. How many games will drag on forever? 7 beats 3. 7 beats 0. 3 beats 0. Etc. Not complicated. Not a forever game. In college they go on forever because they start at the opposing teams 30.

Keep it the way it is now. Stop crying and make a stop

Real sudden death where first score wins wasn't unfair to the loser of the toss before the evolution of the rules to extremely favor the offense. I would be interested to see a study of overtime games by the decade. With the rules governing personal fouls now, especially to a QB and the pass interference calls, it is common for teams to have scoring drives with a big chunk of the yardage coming on questionable calls. Considering that I think there needs to be some rule changes, something like a hybrid between the pro and college system.

I doubt we see any changes to OT anytime soon.
IMO, I say put 12 minutes on the clock in first OT and play 12 minutes. No sudden death.

If still tied at the end of the first OT, move to a second that has sudden death defined.

My lord the suggestions keep getting worse


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How about this ...........

First 5 mins 11 on 11

Second 5 mins 9 on 9

Last 5 mins 7 on 7 ..............blindfolded !!!!!!!



......................just leave like it is.

sudden death first team that scores wins the game..