![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#47 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 46
Posts: 4,628
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Hindsight is certainly 20/20. Suisham has the leg to make that (he just missed it as it was), and you take a chance by putting points on the board. If Eddie Murray was still kicking for the Skins, Gibbs would have gone for it...or punted, which would have lengthened the field for the Cowboys.
To me, it seems that GW did what he could to best protect the field yesterday. For most of the game, the Skins rushed 3 and 4, and dropped 7 back in coverage to protect. Without Sean Taylor back there, it's hard to justify blitzing a lot because you simply leave a weakened secondary out to dry. You cannot put the secondary's lack of discipline square on him. Prioleau and Doughty are a far cry from Pro Bowl safeties, and the Dallas coaching staff saw an opportunity and exploited it. Mental mistakes led to TO getting behind the secondary 3 times in the 2nd half, not GW's preparation and game plan. As far as Samuels goes, he was left on an island to take care of one of the best pass rushers in the NFL. I don't think there is a single tackle in the NFL that can take care of DeMarcus Ware by himself. Jason Campbell had a hell of a game yesterday. He showed the coaching staff that they can put the ball in his hands, and he'll make things happen. However, he's still wet behind the ears and missed several key throws. Only reps and game experience will help him correct those.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
GW is a smart guy. I think he had the conversation w/ the defense they just didn't execute.
As for the 4th and 1. Us TV coaches were all calling for an easy go for it call. They didn't but i can't argue alot about it. If he would have made it, it may have been the right thing to do. Suprised me but i don't think i would call it a bad, bad call. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Springs really had a bad game. I almost wonder if his head wasn't in it. Not that I could blame him for that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
I'm not taking shots at Springs, but the guy just can't cover TO. Not that that is new to Washington, Champ couldn't cover Amani Toomer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Shawn Springs was getting schooled most of the day yesterday. He had a few nice plays, but for the most part he got eaten up. Sean Taylor would have been the difference maker in that game. I hope he isn't out long.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
For a bunch of people who said Dallas would blow us away and the game would not even be close I see a bunch of complaning. Most of the people here did not even think the game would be close so how can you even complain because we did better than you thought we could do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
I agree on both points.. 95% of the coaches in the NFL go for 4th and one rather than opt for a 50 yard attempt.. The FG is the worst option in that position.. Best case, you get the points but the %ages are very low on that distance plus you lose 7 yards in field position with a miss.
Since the Cowboys couldn't run the ball, after the 2nd TO TD I don't know why we didn't go to more Cover 3.. TO was just running free like a deer in a field thru our secondary.. The bloom is still off the rose for Grilliams as far as I am concerned..
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | ||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 46
Posts: 4,628
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
NFL - Washington Redskins/Dallas Cowboys Recap Sunday November 18, 2007 - Yahoo! Sports Quote:
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
Quote:
I was pissed off the Skins couldn't pull off the victory. The game was right there for the taking. A couple of plays was the difference. 1) The Rocky McIntosh interception that was called back because of instant replay review. (That was a catch. The ball never hit the ground.) 2) The Jason Campbell interception at the end of the game. (He should have run the ball.)
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arlington Va.
Age: 48
Posts: 836
|
Re: 2 Qualms with the loss
I dont know if the point has been brought up yet, didnt want to start a new thread. But was anyone else annoyed with the final series of the game? We needed 70 yards with 40 something seconds to go, no timeouts. Yet the skins are doing dump off passes. Where were the 30-40 yard passes? I know they dropped the D into coverage, but this is a passing league now, take a shot at least. Only 3 things can happen 2 of which are good (maybe 4, incomplete pass nothing happens) a completion GOOD, a pass interference GOOD, or an INT BAD. I loved how the skins opened up yesterday and took some chances, but there are still the flashes of conservatism (ie the 2 fourth and 1s that we attempted field goals instead of going for it). We could have beaten a great Dallas team.
__________________
The NEXT special teams coordinator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|