Arrington: 'I could have handled things a bit better'

FRPLG · 11-04-2005, 11:44 AM

Where are all the newbies with 56 in their username since he started playing a lot? Weren't they the ones leading the charge against the team and GW in favor of one guy? One guy who has admitted that he was mostly wrong at the time and that those of us who said maybe he just wasn't 100% ready to go seem to have been right. I don't see them around much. Weaklings they are.

FirstandTen · 11-04-2005, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Where are all the newbies with 56 in their username since he started playing a lot? Weren't they the ones leading the charge against the team and GW in favor of one guy? One guy who has admitted that he was mostly wrong at the time and that those of us who said maybe he just wasn't 100% ready to go seem to have been right. I don't see them around much. Weaklings they are.

Exactly!

SanFranSkinsFan · 11-04-2005, 04:23 PM

LaVar rocks. He's going to take out McNabb for good this week.

FirstandTen · 11-04-2005, 04:25 PM

Lets change the subject a bit here.... How many sacks does Lavar get Sunday Night .... and will he be MIC'ed UP?

onsidekick · 11-04-2005, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstandTen

Lets change the subject a bit here.... How many sacks does Lavar get Sunday Night .... and will he be MIC'ed UP?

Mic'ed up - yes and I'm looking forward to hearing comments like "That's right Motha!? F$%*!!!" all night long. 2 sacks, one pick. Skins 24 Eagles 21

PSUSkinsFan21 · 11-04-2005, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstandTen

Lets change the subject a bit here.... How many sacks does Lavar get Sunday Night .... and will he be MIC'ed UP?

3 Sacks, 9 tackles (3 for loss), and one QB knocked out of the game.

railcon56 · 11-04-2005, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstandTen

Lets change the subject a bit here.... How many sacks does Lavar get Sunday Night .... and will he be MIC'ed UP?

hell yes!!!! worry about the eagles ...lavars playing ....all this is over

#56fanatic · 11-04-2005, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Where are all the newbies with 56 in their username since he started playing a lot? Weren't they the ones leading the charge against the team and GW in favor of one guy? One guy who has admitted that he was mostly wrong at the time and that those of us who said maybe he just wasn't 100% ready to go seem to have been right. I don't see them around much. Weaklings they are.

I haven't been on the site in a week due to travel. But I saw your quote and you know I had to respond. I dont care what was said in the beginning, the fact is and always will be LaVar is better than Holdman and should have been playing. LaVar will say the "right" things right now since the staff HAS to put him in. We all saw how bad Holdman was, and GW couldn't go on any longer trying to fool himself as well as us. Now Holdman has stopped talking to the press. Man these guys get bitter after getting benched. Did he actually think he was going to continue playing ahead of LaVar?

That Guy · 11-04-2005, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

I haven't been on the site in a week due to travel. But I saw your quote and you know I had to respond. I dont care what was said in the beginning, the fact is and always will be LaVar is better than Holdman and should have been playing. LaVar will say the "right" things right now since the staff HAS to put him in. We all saw how bad Holdman was, and GW couldn't go on any longer trying to fool himself as well as us. Now Holdman has stopped talking to the press. Man these guys get bitter after getting benched. Did he actually think he was going to continue playing ahead of LaVar?

in holdman's interviews in before the season even started he said he knew lavar was going to take his starting spot. GW said it had to do with him not having his confidence/speed and missing so much work in the offseason and last year that kept him out of the lineup. You're still implying that GW is purposely (and pointlessly) malicious for no reason (except some unfounded, unexplainable personal hatred for lavar).

MTK · 11-04-2005, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

in holdman's interviews in before the season even started he said he knew lavar was going to take his starting spot. GW said it had to do with him not having his confidence/speed and missing so much work in the offseason and last year that kept him out of the lineup. You're still implying that GW is purposely (and pointlessly) malicious for no reason (except some unfounded, unexplainable personal hatred for lavar).

So what we have is a conspiracy theory to explain a conspiracy theory... interesting.

FirstandTen · 11-04-2005, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

I haven't been on the site in a week due to travel. But I saw your quote and you know I had to respond. I dont care what was said in the beginning, the fact is and always will be LaVar is better than Holdman and should have been playing. LaVar will say the "right" things right now since the staff HAS to put him in. We all saw how bad Holdman was, and GW couldn't go on any longer trying to fool himself as well as us. Now Holdman has stopped talking to the press. Man these guys get bitter after getting benched. Did he actually think he was going to continue playing ahead of LaVar?

You really are a 56 Fanatic..... Stop with the theories this situation is settled just relax and root for the team.

#56fanatic · 11-04-2005, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstandTen

You really are a 56 Fanatic..... Stop with the theories this situation is settled just relax and root for the team.

you people dont know me from me Joe, so to say I am not a true fan of the Redskins is totally wrong. I have been a die hard fan since I was born. Because I have a feeling that one player is better than the other and should be playing doesn't discount my loyalty as well as anyone elses. didn't everyone think benching Brunell was in the best interest of the team? That Ramsey was the better QB. Isn't that the same situation here. Just because I have 56 in logname doesn't make me a LaVar fan, and not a Redskins fan. I have been a fan before LaVar got here and will be a fan when he leaves. All this crap is getting old, you have one side saying I told you so and the other going off about the comments made by LaVar the last couple of days. I have no theories about this team or why he wasnt playing. I was only stating what I heard from programs on TV or columnists in the paper. I have no idea what goes on in the organization as much as you do. I dont know why you and the other people who continuously bash what I say. I thought this was an opinion site. So if Green Bay decided to sit Brett and play Aaron Rogers, you dont think some green bay fans would question the coaches decision. If you think they wouldn't you are crazy. Same thing w/ Vick and all the other superstar players. (and before you start bashing me with this one, In no way am I saying LaVar is a superstar) dont forget we are comparing a LB in his prime to a veteran(who is servicable) but not that good. I would be making the same comments if it were Marcus Washington getting benched infavor of Holdman. Regardless of the player, if anyone feels one player is better than the one in front of him, there are going to be questions, and opinions on why there aren't playing. Cant you just leave it alone.

cpayne5 · 11-04-2005, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

you people dont know me from me Joe,

I know Joe, and you my friend, are no Joe.

#56fanatic · 11-04-2005, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpayne5

I know Joe, and you my friend, are no Joe.

Thats funny, a bad choice of names in this thread, maybe I should have used Adam or some other common name!

Southpaw · 11-04-2005, 04:03 PM

I love how this has turned around. When LaVar played well in the San Francisco game, all of the "xxxnamexxx56" people were throwing "I told you so's" around, and all the coach followers where saying things like "There's no need for I told you so's... that's childish" blah blah. Suddenly, LaVar admits he wasn't playing at full speed, and there's 3 pages of coach f'ers slamming the LaVar fans... can we say hypocrisy?

And for the record, I was one of the LaVar supporters, but I was by no means a Williams hater. And regardless of whether he was %100 or not, LaVar at half speed is still better than Holdman at full speed.

11-04-2005, 11:44 AM	#1
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 10,164	Re: Arrington: 'I could have handled things a bit better' Where are all the newbies with 56 in their username since he started playing a lot? Weren't they the ones leading the charge against the team and GW in favor of one guy? One guy who has admitted that he was mostly wrong at the time and that those of us who said maybe he just wasn't 100% ready to go seem to have been right. I don't see them around much. Weaklings they are.

11-04-2005, 04:23 PM	#3
SanFranSkinsFan Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 102	Re: Arrington: 'I could have handled things a bit better' LaVar rocks. He's going to take out McNabb for good this week.

11-04-2005, 04:25 PM	#4
FirstandTen Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bristow VA Age: 49 Posts: 254	Re: Arrington: 'I could have handled things a bit better' Lets change the subject a bit here.... How many sacks does Lavar get Sunday Night .... and will he be MIC'ed UP?

11-04-2005, 04:03 PM	#15
Southpaw The Starter Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: So. MD Age: 47 Posts: 1,319	Re: Arrington: 'I could have handled things a bit better' I love how this has turned around. When LaVar played well in the San Francisco game, all of the "xxxnamexxx56" people were throwing "I told you so's" around, and all the coach followers where saying things like "There's no need for I told you so's... that's childish" blah blah. Suddenly, LaVar admits he wasn't playing at full speed, and there's 3 pages of coach f'ers slamming the LaVar fans... can we say hypocrisy? And for the record, I was one of the LaVar supporters, but I was by no means a Williams hater. And regardless of whether he was %100 or not, LaVar at half speed is still better than Holdman at full speed. Last edited by Southpaw; 11-04-2005 at 04:22 PM.

Arrington: 'I could have handled things a bit better'

Locker Room Main Forum