![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Starting Campbell Now Makes Cap Sense
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
|
Re: Starting Campbell Now Makes Cap Sense
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: Starting Campbell Now Makes Cap Sense
Quote:
And how bad did those SAME TITANS, SHIT kick us in the nuts today???
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Starting Campbell Now Makes Cap Sense
Quote:
I honestly do not think Brunell is the sole problem with the team or why their offense is so inconsistent, but I will say he is part of the problem. As fans we sometimes get frustrated with JG because he does not seem to think Brunell has anything to do with the teams poor showing in the passing game. I'd be willing to bet there are coaches around the league that would have benched Brunell for good long time ago. Again it's not all his fault, but he's the trigger man. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Starting Campbell Now Makes Cap Sense
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Starting Campbell Now Makes Cap Sense
Quote:
Maybe he needs to send some kind of message to capture the attention of these guys so they will begin to turn in better performances, and don't constantly defend individual players who do not perform up to expectations hiding behind that umbrella of "We're All In This Together". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|