Simeon Rice released by Bucs then Broncos. Now a Colt.

sandtrapjack · 07-29-2007, 08:47 PM

The release of Rice was not a cap saving move. If it were, he would have been cut on June 1st.

He was cut because he could not pass a physical and his shoulder is still not healed yet. The guy is rode hard, put up wet and injured.

Why sign a guy to a contract if he is not going to be able to contribute?

The only team that needs to sign a guy like Rice is one which needs depth at the position. the 'Skins need someone who can come in and contribute from the start.

Pass of Rice, watch the waiver wire during camp and you could find someone with more miles on him.

View Poll Results: Should the Redskins sign Simeon Rice?
Yes	84	51.22%
No	80	48.78%
Voters: 164. You may not vote on this poll

07-29-2007, 08:47 PM	#19
sandtrapjack The Starter Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,994	Re: Simeon Rice released by Bucs The release of Rice was not a cap saving move. If it were, he would have been cut on June 1st. He was cut because he could not pass a physical and his shoulder is still not healed yet. The guy is rode hard, put up wet and injured. Why sign a guy to a contract if he is not going to be able to contribute? The only team that needs to sign a guy like Rice is one which needs depth at the position. the 'Skins need someone who can come in and contribute from the start. Pass of Rice, watch the waiver wire during camp and you could find someone with more miles on him.

Simeon Rice released by Bucs then Broncos. Now a Colt.

Locker Room Main Forum