Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


James Thrash

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2007, 06:32 PM   #16
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfanthru&thru View Post
anyone want to retract some of their Thrash bashing after his performance today?
Nope. He played about to his potential...average.
2 catches for 11 yards, a fumble lost (could have been HUGE), and did his only damage during that return.
How exactly did he have a great performance (like you are implying)?
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-07-2007, 06:54 PM   #17
Redskins247
Impact Rookie
 
Redskins247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 877
Re: James Thrash

That punt return was great...the fumble was just a good pop from the lions guy, we got it back, so you still have to give Thrash credit for that touchdown drive.

Thrash is a Gibbs "true Redskin" kind of guy
Redskins247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 06:54 PM   #18
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: James Thrash

I continue to be disturbed by the way people under value Thrash. No one is saying he's a great reciever, but he's consistent w/above avg. hands & is tough. He blocks well & is a good coverage man on teams.

James Thrash is also an all around footbally player, you can't say that about a no. of nfl wr's.

He had a good game today & he'll continue to help the team the rest of the season. He even got deep twice & made the catch out of bounds. If JC puts those a little inside those are big plays.

Why criticize him for what he lacks. Clearly he helps the team.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 07:05 PM   #19
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins247 View Post
That punt return was great...the fumble was just a good pop from the lions guy, we got it back, so you still have to give Thrash credit for that touchdown drive.

Thrash is a Gibbs "true Redskin" kind of guy
We got it back cause Rock hustled all the way. I don't care HOW he fumbled, he fumbled. That was huge, and could have been horrible.

He had an average day and played to his talent.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 07:06 PM   #20
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
I continue to be disturbed by the way people under value Thrash. No one is saying he's a great reciever, but he's consistent w/above avg. hands & is tough. He blocks well & is a good coverage man on teams.

James Thrash is also an all around footbally player, you can't say that about a no. of nfl wr's.

He had a good game today & he'll continue to help the team the rest of the season. He even got deep twice & made the catch out of bounds. If JC puts those a little inside those are big plays.

Why criticize him for what he lacks. Clearly he helps the team.
It's not that...people have exhaulted him to GREAT status, and he's just average. I love his heart and he's dedicated, so that's great, but he's nothing extra special.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 08:27 PM   #21
Campbell17
Impact Rookie
 
Campbell17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Haddonfield, NJ
Age: 31
Posts: 642
Re: James Thrash

with weapons like moss, randle el, and cooley, and with the recent signing of Keenan McCardell, Thrash is usless.
__________________
This time instead of some lousy joke, humerous comment, racial slur, or a famous quote, I will write small, and be the bigger person.
Campbell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:04 PM   #22
skinsfan45
Camp Scrub
 
skinsfan45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
We, as Redskins fans, think Thrash is special, but he's not. If Moss is out vs the Lions (seems likely) then we are up shit's creek without a paddle.
This lineup does not scare anyone:
1- Randel El
2- Caldwell
3- McCardell
4- Thrash
5- Lloyd (unsure if he will play this week too)

Wrong,Wrong, Wrong -- Thrash is special and that creek ain't shit:smashfrea
skinsfan45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:12 PM   #23
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,975
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan45 View Post
Wrong,Wrong, Wrong -- Thrash is special and that creek ain't shit:smashfrea

Im more worried about Caldwell than any others....
I think he may be the odd man out

In a weird way, Im still hoping Lloyd gets it and gets a 2nd chance
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:21 PM   #24
MTRedskinsFan
Registered User
 
MTRedskinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 359
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
Thrash is ok at best.
I can only see him in 3 WR sets...which is rare anyways.

If he starts over Lloyd, I will be upset.
Yes, I think Lloyd may suck, but...cmon, he's got a lot of natural ability.

I understand if they start Thrash, just to send Lloyd a message...but the plan was always...Moss, Lloyd, Randel El...if Lloyd doesn't get in the game today, he never will.

Thrash aint anything special...yes, he does catch well, but does he have starting WR talent....I dont think so.
Just so you know I'm not disagreeing out of perfect hindsight vision, my posts leading up the game today said Thrash was the best replacement. You're wrong about him. Aside from ARE, Thrash is probably the best at getting open (Moss does it w/ his speed but not much beyond that). Thrash also has the best hands on the team (remember all the dropped passes to Moss and Lloyd). Even ARE drops a few. Thrash is almost a guaranteed catch and he is tough as hell after the catch. If anyone should move ahead of him it would be Caldwell.
MTRedskinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:26 PM   #25
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
Im more worried about Caldwell than any others....
I think he may be the odd man out

In a weird way, Im still hoping Lloyd gets it and gets a 2nd chance
We have soooo much more invested in Lloyd than Caldwell, and it'd be nice to see a return on that investment
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:37 PM   #26
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan45 View Post
Wrong,Wrong, Wrong -- Thrash is special and that creek ain't shit:smashfrea
No he's not...but apparently we can win without Moss and ARE.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 11:24 PM   #27
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
Nope. He played about to his potential...average.
2 catches for 11 yards, a fumble lost (could have been HUGE), and did his only damage during that return.
How exactly did he have a great performance (like you are implying)?
I never said he had a great performance but he had a damn good game for someone multiple people have claimed shouldn't even have a spot on the roster. plus he was the teams only consistent down the field threat but Campbell was a little errant on his down field passes to Thrash which resulted in Thrash being out of bounds for each catch.
__________________
"Ahhh, so you're stupid in 3 languages?"
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2007, 12:57 AM   #28
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 4,719
Re: James Thrash

Odd argument here... Is Thrash great? Well, no question he's not as good as Moss or ARE or McCardell, even at his age. But who cares? He busts his ass every play, he's (so everyone on the skins seems to say) one of the hardest workers on the team, he does whatever they ask, and when, with our 2 best WRs (and our best PR) down, they needed someone to make a play, he did. And that's part of why we won.

He's got less talent than Lloyd and yet he makes plays. Why? Because he works harder. That's why Gibbs (and everyone else in the locker room) loves the guy. A core Redskin.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2007, 12:59 AM   #29
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWsleep View Post
Odd argument here... Is Thrash great? Well, no question he's not as good as Moss or ARE or McCardell, even at his age. But who cares? He busts his ass every play, he's (so everyone on the skins seems to say) one of the hardest workers on the team, he does whatever they ask, and when, with our 2 best WRs (and our best PR) down, they needed someone to make a play, he did. And that's part of why we won.

He's got less talent than Lloyd and yet he makes plays. Why? Because he works harder. That's why Gibbs (and everyone else in the locker room) loves the guy. A core Redskin.
Sums it up. Time to close this thread on a good note.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2007, 01:15 AM   #30
SanFranSkinsFan
Special Teams
 
SanFranSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
Re: James Thrash

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCborn View Post
WR James Thrash a Washington Redskin twice over, with few seasons as an Eagle, has not been firmly worked into the offensive scheme so far.
Thrash has come in on a few passing downs in recent games, but he seems to be a far second reciever behind both Moss and Randle El.

My question is how can Thrash be best utilized in the current offense?
Hopefully as a backup to Santana and Randel El. Keenan is probably better overall and obviously Cooley and now Sellers should be factors. But Thrash should pick up the trash going over the middle on some slants, since he's not much a speed threat and the Packers LBs ain't that fast (besides Barnett).
SanFranSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.71379 seconds with 12 queries