Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Case For...

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2009, 11:54 PM   #1
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,178
Re: The Case For...

ANQUAN BOLDIN!!!! Is a True Stud #1 WR, this would mean Moss can be a very good Num2, and Thomas can be the 3. I would trade our 13th Pick and Randel El to AZ... We can add a DL or OL later in the draft or via F.A.

Think about it.. Boldin,Moss,Cooley,Portis WOW!
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2009, 11:58 PM   #2
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
ANQUAN BOLDIN!!!! Is a True Stud #1 WR, this would mean Moss can be a very good Num2, and Thomas can be the 3. I would trade our 13th Pick and Randel El to AZ... We can add a DL or OL later in the draft or via F.A.

Think about it.. Boldin,Moss,Cooley,Portis WOW!
I would like to see El in the slot next year for us.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 12:27 AM   #3
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
ANQUAN BOLDIN!!!! Is a True Stud #1 WR, this would mean Moss can be a very good Num2, and Thomas can be the 3. I would trade our 13th Pick and Randel El to AZ... We can add a DL or OL later in the draft or via F.A.

Think about it.. Boldin,Moss,Cooley,Portis WOW!
Easy there. We've spent a lot of effort as a team trying to bring in recievers and have even had them in the past. Most recent ones being Coles during his first year with us and Moss during his first year with us, and Cooley over the last three or four years. The most it's gotten is us is one playoff game. Ironically I'd argue the reasons we made the playoffs when we did was mainly in part because of the acquisitions we made on the O-line since Jansen, subquently leading us to acquire Samuals, Dockery, Thomas, Rabach, and Kendall. We're at our best when our O-Line is healthy and teams have proven time and time again that the Madden dream team lineup's rarely work, with the Lions being the poster child followed by the Bengals. Arizona is an exception to that rule and they came complete with an elite Quarterback in Kurt Warner.

I believe you also saw how well Campbell can be when he has time to throw as well as a running game to supplement our offense and you also saw how poorly we did when our O-line crumbled. Adding another reciever that will not only take us out a high draft pick not to mention valuable salary capspace is not the answer.

One things for sure we have to add a Tackle, preferably a right tackle that can later become a left tackle. Unfortunately I might have to seatle for Jordan Gross, which wouldn't be the worse thing. He's remained healthy for most of his career and elite tackles have proven they can be effective till their mid 30's. On top of that he can play Left Tackle so should Samuels go down we would have a guy that could at least protect JC's blind side.

Still I would much rather see the team draft a guy that we can use for the next 5 to 10 years instead of a guy that might last 3 to 5 years if we're lucky. Of course he'll probably bring in a seven year contract so that'll help. Hell if I get my way the team will walk away with a RT/LT hybrid in the first and a Center in the third, but that will not happen.

A revamped O-line that can get at least three new starters on the field will give JC the time he needs while our freaking fleet of wideouts attempts to get open. On top of that we'll be able to get back our running game which is critical as this teams style ever since Gibbs came back has been to close out games on the ground which is fine because we have the defense that can back us up.

However I will say it was hillarious at the pro bowl when Portis turned to Boldin and said "WHAT UP TEAMMATE!"
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 12:38 AM   #4
Trample the Elderly
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Easy there. We've spent a lot of effort as a team trying to bring in recievers and have even had them in the past. Most recent ones being Coles during his first year with us and Moss during his first year with us, and Cooley over the last three or four years. The most it's gotten is us is one playoff game. Ironically I'd argue the reasons we made the playoffs when we did was mainly in part because of the acquisitions we made on the O-line since Jansen, subquently leading us to acquire Samuals, Dockery, Thomas, Rabach, and Kendall. We're at our best when our O-Line is healthy and teams have proven time and time again that the Madden dream team lineup's rarely work, with the Lions being the poster child followed by the Bengals. Arizona is an exception to that rule and they came complete with an elite Quarterback in Kurt Warner.

I believe you also saw how well Campbell can be when he has time to throw as well as a running game to supplement our offense and you also saw how poorly we did when our O-line crumbled. Adding another reciever that will not only take us out a high draft pick not to mention valuable salary capspace is not the answer.

One things for sure we have to add a Tackle, preferably a right tackle that can later become a left tackle. Unfortunately I might have to seatle for Jordan Gross, which wouldn't be the worse thing. He's remained healthy for most of his career and elite tackles have proven they can be effective till their mid 30's. On top of that he can play Left Tackle so should Samuels go down we would have a guy that could at least protect JC's blind side.

Still I would much rather see the team draft a guy that we can use for the next 5 to 10 years instead of a guy that might last 3 to 5 years if we're lucky. Of course he'll probably bring in a seven year contract so that'll help. Hell if I get my way the team will walk away with a RT/LT hybrid in the first and a Center in the third, but that will not happen.

A revamped O-line that can get at least three new starters on the field will give JC the time he needs while our freaking fleet of wideouts attempts to get open. On top of that we'll be able to get back our running game which is critical as this teams style ever since Gibbs came back has been to close out games on the ground which is fine because we have the defense that can back us up.

However I will say it was hillarious at the pro bowl when Portis turned to Boldin and said "WHAT UP TEAMMATE!"
So you're saying Jordan Gross Dirtbag?
Trample the Elderly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 02:02 AM   #5
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly View Post
So you're saying Jordan Gross Dirtbag?
More or less yes. Only from the position on what I think the front office might do. If it were me I would spend our first two draft picks on a RT and a Center or Guard (especially if a guy like Herman Johnson fell to us in the third). Then sign a stopgap at OLB then wait for next years draft to focus on the D-Line and hope that a change in mentality will equal a more productive defensive front. Still the O-Line is in the burning building while the D-Line is stuck in the building next to the burning building.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 09:12 AM   #6
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
ANQUAN BOLDIN!!!! Is a True Stud #1 WR, this would mean Moss can be a very good Num2, and Thomas can be the 3. I would trade our 13th Pick and Randel El to AZ... We can add a DL or OL later in the draft or via F.A.

Think about it.. Boldin,Moss,Cooley,Portis WOW!
Im thinking about it... JC gets the snap Boldin, Moss, Cooley running their routes. No protection for JC. JC cant find recievers. SACK! or kill Portis again!Official Site of the Arizona Cardinals


EUGENE MONROE - VIRGINIA - OFFENSIVE TACKLE
lets start doing things in order.

Last edited by 44ever; 02-14-2009 at 09:26 AM.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 09:45 AM   #7
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44ever View Post
Im thinking about it... JC gets the snap Boldin, Moss, Cooley running their routes. No protection for JC. JC cant find recievers. SACK! or kill Portis again!Official Site of the Arizona Cardinals


EUGENE MONROE - VIRGINIA - OFFENSIVE TACKLE
YouTube - LT Eugene Monroe Highlights Virginia 2008
lets start doing things in order.
Exactly. Nice post 44. And Monroe is a topflight OT.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 10:03 AM   #8
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: The Case For...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
Exactly. Nice post 44. And Monroe is a topflight OT.
Im just afraid he will get taken too soon. Maybe we get lucky.

The problem I see with FA is anyone good is $$$$$ or/and franchise tag and age. The rest dont do much to help us. We definatly dont want to be giving up any draft picks.

I would like to do it through the draft and develop from within. We need to start finding our own diamonds in the rough instead of paying big for ify FA's.

Yes it may take a little longer to get where we want to go but once there we can be there for a long time.

After lossing for so many years, one winning season wont satisfy me.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.00808 seconds with 12 queries