Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes

[celts32]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

I wouldn't blame you for doubting Redskins FO, but if you are right; we trade for Cutler with our picks (obviously we won't trade JC due to Zorn's comments).. Cutler then would be riding bench as #2 QB because Zorn basically said that JC is our starter..

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by celts32

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

Zorn might meant that way, but I doubt it..

That's exactly what I'm trying to say.. I find it hard to believe that Redskins are willing to waste our picks, especially when we have pressing needs to fill in positions such as RT, DE and LB..

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by celts32

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

You're sure of that huh? And you're sure Zorn would lie if they were interested in Cutler? We're not talking about Vinny here. I think Zorn has learned not to go so in depth about questions because he's so honest and some things are better left unsaid, but he was asked a direct question and he didn't beat around the bush, he gave a direct answer. He didn't try to evade the question. I don't think he's a liar. I don't think his priorities are to put football first if you know what I mean. If that makes me gullible than I guess I'm gullible but I'm surely not jaded about Zorn because of the way Vinny does his job. But I guess I know Zorn about as well as you do, so who knows? I guess my perspective of the man is different than yours. I've seen no reason to doubt his word. Vinny? Yes. Zorn? Not from what I've seen so far.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

You're sure of that huh? And you're sure Zorn would lie if they were interested in Cutler? We're not talking about Vinny here. I think Zorn has learned not to go so in depth about questions because he's so honest and some things are better left unsaid, but he was asked a direct question and he didn't beat around the bush, he gave a direct answer. He didn't try to evade the question. I don't think he's a liar. I don't think his priorities are to put football first if you know what I mean. If that makes me gullible than I guess I'm gullible but I'm surely not jaded about Zorn because of the way Vinny does his job. But I guess I know Zorn about as well as you do, so who knows? I guess my perspective of the man is different than yours. I've seen no reason to doubt his word. Vinny? Yes. Zorn? Not from what I've seen so far.

I don't really doubt Zorn's word as much as I just don't believe he has much say in the matter. I think Zorn probably does believe that Campbell will be his QB so he's not lying by saying that. Vinny may still feel otherwise though.