![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
It's obvious they have some plays for Kelly, they've tried to hit him deep a few times per game. Yeah it would be nice to see them dialing something up for Thomas deep.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
Quote:
Maybe i'm offbase here but i watched the game last night. GB had everyone involved in the offense and Gruden did a good job of explaining the plays. McCarthy (and Childress) called some great plays to get guys open. It doesn't look like rocket science here. You're right Zorn has got to draw up some plays to get EVERYONE involved. If not SM and Cooley are getting doubled more often than not. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
I'm not impressed with these "so-called" WRs we drafted. It would have made more sense to keep Keenan and draft O-line men. You know I keep hearing everyone talking all this trash about last year's draft and I'm still pissed. Phil Loadholt did good last night STARTING for Minn. We could really use another center like Alex Mack. Perhaps no one else notices that Casey is starting to get a lot more penalties? Why we passed on Duke is beyond me? So what if he had a bad game. So we just throw out the whole season that got him to a bowl game because he has a bad game? He would've been a steal and who do we get? eff Vinny.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
Quote:
And if it cost us a key special teams player, then we'd be worse off. Again, just because you draft LBs, Safeties, Backs, and Recievers with second day selections doesn't mean you'll improve your special teams necessarily, but that is how you do it.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
Quote:
ST is great but CP, Rock, and Betts are running out of steam. The O line is the problem.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
Quote:
The O-Line is a problem, but it's a problem because Thomas, who was the key cog on the interior, is injured again. It's not a problem because Rinehart/Heyer can't play. Dockery-Rabach-Rinehart on the interior OL scares no one, but the hope is that by the end of the year, Rinehart is the best of the three.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: looking at the numbers at the 25% mark of the season
Quote:
There is no way in my mind that this: Samuels, Dock, Rabback, Mack, Loadholt Montgomery, Rinehart, Batiste, Robinson Sounds worst than this: Samuels, Dock, Rabback, Thomas, Heyer Williams, Montgomery, Rinehart, Batiste Thomas is already gone for the season if not for good. Later in the season? No way! The time to play is now.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|