Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why we need to rout for 2-14

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-09-2009, 10:48 AM   #11
Bill B
Impact Rookie
 
Bill B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
Re: Why we need to rout for 2-14

SBXVII - good response and that point you made about DS not being able to take it anymore forcing a change is what I am trying to get at.

Like I said it pains me to see the team lose but the current philosphy and path the team has taken does not give fans much hope now and for the future. I think it was Tony Dungy who said it best that when you rebuild you can't do it halfway - you need to go all the way. Looking at the current roster do many of you all have a lot of hope that the team is successfully replenshing itself with youth to take over when veterans start to wear out (and remember that the average legnth of nfl tenure is 3-4 years and injuries are a big part of the game as every team has them). How many of you all are happy with the team allocating so much money to a few high priced players leaving team depth, well pretty much unaddressed? At the end of the season if you are going to miss the playoffs (and lets be honest here - the Skins chances of making the playoffs are not too good) wouldn't you really like to see the team make a complete overhaul instead of just tinkering?
Bill B is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.60231 seconds with 11 queries