ESPN: Clayton Expects Skins to Tender Campbell for a 1st and 3rd

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Hell if we got a 1st and 3rd for him I'd vote for Obama in 2012.

Alright alright, keep your freaking politics out of this.

Back to the subject, I was thinking that the only way I'd be on board with drafting Bradford would be if we get a first-rounder for Campbell....or MAYBE a second-rounder.

Still, if we draft Bradford without Campbell in the roster, we would probably need to find a veteran QB, and I know the there are slim pickings out there. But I wonder how would a Marc Bulger look here in Washington?

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

You expect people to listen to that cruddy little emoticon!! Dude if you want people to pay attention then you need to throw in something like this.


Or better yet:

[takethecake]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Still, if we draft Bradford without Campbell in the roster, we would probably need to find a veteran QB, and I know the there are slim pickings out there. But I wonder how would a Marc Bulger look here in Washington?

Or perhaps Brett Favre will decide... just kidding


I'd really prefer it if campbell stayed in Washington - everyone seems to either want him out, or to just use him as a stopgap until shanny's "quarterback of the future." I know he's had his shots, but what if JC just has a monster year in 2010? Is it that implausible that he could do well in shanny's offense?

I digress...Regardless of whether he plays for one year or more, I think he's too valuable to the redskins to give up right now, especially with the dearth of veteran QBs around that you mentioned. He's the only semblance of a leader we have on this offense, and I think that's overlooked a lot.

[skinsfaninok]

No way we get a 1st and 3rd for Campbell. It just won't happen. Plus we should keep him anyway because Bradford will be a rookie.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

No way we get a 1st and 3rd for Campbell. It just won't happen. Plus we should keep him anyway because Bradford will be a rookie.

This talk of contract tender has nothing to do with trade value. If this report is right, we are not trading JC for a 1 and a 3. We are simply offering a contract at that level. Then, if we want to trade him, we can trade him for whatever we want.