Condoms For First Graders?

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

#1 - kids no sexy time - agreed. There should be no problem reaching a group consensus on this one.

#2 - kids are the responsibility of parents and society at large. No way we will reach a consensus here.

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

of course

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

of course

Matty get out get out you are falling into their trap of endless blab.

[souperbad]

Kids got it tough these days. Not only do they have to draw inside the lines...now they have to worry about the clap.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Matty get out get out you are falling into their trap of endless blab.

who is "their"?

and why is trying to start a discussion from a point of consensus considered endless blab?

as for the discussion, good luck joe.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Matty get out get out you are falling into their trap of endless blab.

lol - quite frankly, and pretty obviously, I never thought Matty would be the problem.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

Do you agree that Jews and Slavs are detrimental to the racial hygene of the Aryan race? Do you agree that Christians are tools of the West to undermine the Party and should be eliminated? Do you think that Saddam Hussein has aerial vehicles cappable of spreading mustard gas all over the East Coast and should therefore be removed?

I don't subscribe to fear mongering. No, it doesn't take a village to raise a child. It takes a mother and father. Why is it people think they have the right and responsibility to stick their noses in other people's business? If they want condoms in Mass for their kids, fine. Dumb Northerners get what they deserve! While they're at it, how about a bong hit?

Baby bong pic sparks fury | The Sun |News

Because children need to know about the dangers of drug abuse.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by souperbad

Kids got it tough these days. Not only do they have to draw inside the lines...now they have to worry about the clap.

[budw38]

Originally Posted by Buster

Nice to see a voice of reason here. Hit the nail on the head. However, I'm not sure you're in as much agreement with Saden as your "exactly" statement would indicate...he seems to be open to handing kids condoms with their boxes of jumbo crayons and juice boxes.

Thank you for the nice words . When I used the word exactly , I meant it as " exactly , the school should not be involved in parenting " . I understand to a degree condoms in high school < not saying it is right or wrong > . My feeling is more , schools teach math, english , science .... parents teach ethics , morels , tolerance ect.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

who is "their"?

and why is trying to start a discussion from a point of consensus considered endless blab?

as for the discussion, good luck joe.

Yeah, I know. Can't force anyone to agree. Was hoping, for a change, that people might actually try looking at things differently.

[MTK]

I'm the problem?

I'm playing along now.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

who is "their"?

and why is trying to start a discussion from a point of consensus considered endless blab?

as for the discussion, good luck joe.

Seriously. Might as well resurrect the "Never Ending Thread" and just merge it with this, because it will go on forever.

Personally I think the notion of putting condoms in the hands of 6 year olds is waaaay beyond retarded. But every liberal on this site will just shake their head at anything else I have to say on the matter.

I'm somewhere in between Matty and Buster on this issue. I'll leave it at that. Delving into it any further will be wasted energy. I have and will continue to enjoy reading this thread though.

Happy Friday everyone.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I'm the problem?

I'm playing along now.

Damn and I was trying so hard to be the problem!

[saden1]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

I am going to try something new and different for our Warpath discussions: What can we agree on? Really. Start out broad, if we can narrow it down, great. If we have to broaden, it, fine. But let’s work on finding a statement, relevant to this discussion, that we can all agree on. Is there one?

Let me throw something out there:
1. “Six year olds should not be engaging in intimate sexual activity of any kind.” – Nice, broad terms. Can you reasonably define the terms of this statement for yourself so that you can agree with it. I am not concerned with what six year olds are actually doing – This is a statement concerning the standards we uniformly hold as a society regardless of whether individuals within the society occasionally don’t comply with the standard.

Here’s a trickier one:
2. “The sexual activity of children is a public health issue that affects the entire society, not just the individuals involved or their immediate families.” Again, can you reasonably define the terms of this statement in such a way as to agree with it? If not, how would you change it to make it something we could all agree on?

I would hope we can come to an agreement on No.1. I think No.2 will be trickier.

In terms of "everyone", let make this a real challenge. I challenge Matty, saden, buster, bud38, TTE, SS84, firstdown and GhettoDog, to find a statement that they can all agree on as to No.1 and No.2.

I dare you gentlemen. I believe each of you intelligent enough to understand the concept. I am not, however, so sure that each of you is willing to see what is "right" about someone else's point of view as to allow for finding a commonality. Quite frankly, I expect you to fail.

Shock me. I double dog dare you.

Parents want choice in what schools can teach their kids. I would support sending kids home with a letter telling parents what is going on in school and asking them whether they want their kids to attend informational session on sex education where condom use will be discussed and how to get a hold them for free at the school health clinic.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by saden1

Parents want choice in what schools can teach their kids. I would support sending kids home with a letter telling parents what is going on in school and asking them whether they want their kids to attend informational session on sex education where condom use will be discussed and how to get a hold them for free at the school health clinic.

That seems reasonable, but the Mass schools have circumvented the parents.