![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Who's the more problematic player? | |||
Arrington |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
30 | 40.54% |
Taylor |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
44 | 59.46% |
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
And I'm pretty sure Winslow signed after Taylor's deal was done. Didn't the Browns have a fairly tough time signing him, in part because he has the Postons? I seem to remember Winslow's negotiations dragging on longer than Taylors, but I could be wrong. Incidentally, in case anyone was interested, the best info I could find on Ed Reed's Contract was that he got a $3.625 million signing bonus in 2002 plus $275,000 in salary. 2003 he got $443,750. And this year he scheduled to make less than $600,000. He is in his final year of his rookie contract, and even after becoming Defensive MVP, he still hasn't demanded a new contract and he's never held out from all the information I was able to find. Now, Reed was drafted #24 in the 2002 draft, so certainly his contract should be less than Taylor's (inflation and higher draft position), but if ever there was a safety that could have legitimately demanded more $ than between $300k and $600k per year, it is Ed Reed. Again, I like Taylor, but I think we're being a little too easy on a kid who clearly has one heck of an attitude problem.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 45
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|