Should T.O. be a first ballot Hall of Famer?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I second that and for that matter, I would take Monk over Rice any day.

Over Rice? I love Monk but let's come back down to reality.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Over Rice? I love Monk but let's come back down to reality.

Beat me to it.

In the history of the NFL, ranking for WRs are:

1. Rice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
2. Largent
3. Everyone else




Rice is the GOAT and it is not even close.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Over Rice? I love Monk but let's come back down to reality.

I think I agree with you. If given the choice and I can't have both..... I'll take Rice over Monk everyday and twice on Sunday. Monks my boy but Rice is to WR's what D.Green (Skins) was to CB's.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Over Rice? I love Monk but let's come back down to reality.

Who did Monk have for QB's and who did Rice have? Monk's #'s with 1 good QB and 2 average QB are impressive, what would he have done with back to back HOF QB's. Don't under estimate Monk.

[Leader In Sports]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Who did Monk have for QB's and who did Rice have? Monk's #'s with 1 good QB and 2 average QB are impressive, what would he have done with back to back HOF QB's. Don't under estimate Monk.

Montana had success before Jerry Rice. Steve Young however would not be in the HOF without have the benefit of Rice's talent.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Who did Monk have for QB's and who did Rice have? Monk's #'s with 1 good QB and 2 average QB are impressive, what would he have done with back to back HOF QB's. Don't under estimate Monk.

Not underestimating him at all. I just don't put Monk in the class of Rice. I wouldn't put anyone in his class.

Monk was very good, Rice was great. Some even argue the single best football player to have played the game. Never heard anyone make that argument for Monk.

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Not underestimating him at all. I just don't put Monk in the class of Rice. I wouldn't put anyone in his class.

Monk was very good, Rice was great. Some even argue the single best football player to have played the game. Never heard anyone make that argument for Monk.

You don't consider Art Monk a great wide receiver?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

You don't consider Art Monk a great wide receiver?

Great as in the same class as Rice? No.

What's wrong with saying he was very good?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

You don't consider Art Monk a great wide receiver?

He WAS great. However, Rice was the GOAT. You just can't compare ANYONE with Rice. This can be said without denigrating or disrespecting Monk or anyone else you're talking about.

It's like talking about Michael Jordan in basketball. Yes, there WERE other great players, but they're not Mike.

Rice vs. Monk is about equivalent to talking about Jordan vs. Dr. J.