![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
If it felt like Cofield did little in this game, thats partially because he didn't play a whole lot.
But Arizona could pass as much as they wanted as long as they could block him one on one.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
This is concerning me a little bit because I was never a believer in Cofield as our NT. I think he'd be a helluva DE, but not a NT. I hope he improves, because his job is to take on two blockers and allow our LBs to go for the kill. I think his performance has been disguised a bit by Haslett's scheming and the great pass rush created by Rak and Kerrigan.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
Personally I think we are ok with Cofield as long as he steadly improves but once again, were playing NT unnaturally. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|