Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2012, 02:36 PM   #1
polywog
Special Teams
 
polywog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Somewhere in Maryland....
Posts: 196
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Three receivers with less than 20 career receptions? Was this a riddle?
Who was Helu? Who was Cariker? All these players just needed a shot.
polywog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 03:41 PM   #2
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by polywog View Post
Who was Helu? Who was Cariker? All these players just needed a shot.
That doesn't mean that every player who gets a shot tears it up.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 03:47 PM   #3
polywog
Special Teams
 
polywog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Somewhere in Maryland....
Posts: 196
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
That doesn't mean that every player who gets a shot tears it up.

?????

No way - everybody picked in the 7th round or shortly thereafter makes the pro-bowl! geesh!


Last edited by polywog; 01-05-2012 at 03:54 PM.
polywog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 04:07 PM   #4
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by polywog View Post
Who was Helu? Who was Cariker? All these players just needed a shot.
Of course.. I was being humorous (kinda) but as much as I think Hankerson will be a stud, Paul looks like James Thrash 2.0 and Robinson may be Terrence Austin with a couple more years under his belt. I hope we plan on surrounding Hankerson with some more talented WR than Paul and Robinson.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 04:32 PM   #5
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Of course.. I was being humorous (kinda) but as much as I think Hankerson will be a stud, Paul looks like James Thrash 2.0 and Robinson may be Terrence Austin with a couple more years under his belt. I hope we plan on surrounding Hankerson with some more talented WR than Paul and Robinson.
I'm really hoping we can pick up Blackmon if he falls to us. That would be so nice to have Blackmon, Hankerson, Paul, Robinson, and Austin as our WR corp.
mbedner3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 04:47 PM   #6
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I'm really hoping we can pick up Blackmon if he falls to us. That would be so nice to have Blackmon, Hankerson, Paul, Robinson, and Austin as our WR corp.
Why exactly would that be nice? Not being a dick, but when did Paul, Robinson or Austin show ANYTHING that would indicate them being consistent performers at WR? Paul played 13 games and caught 2 balls. Robinson didn't get off the practice squad until week 17 and was inactive. Austin has been on the roster for 2 years (18 games) and has 15 catches. Sure these guys are young, homegrown draft picks and may a future role but going into next season with the 5 you mentioned would be a disaster.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 05:19 PM   #7
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Why exactly would that be nice? Not being a dick, but when did Paul, Robinson or Austin show ANYTHING that would indicate them being consistent performers at WR? Paul played 13 games and caught 2 balls. Robinson didn't get off the practice squad until week 17 and was inactive. Austin has been on the roster for 2 years (18 games) and has 15 catches. Sure these guys are young, homegrown draft picks and may a future role but going into next season with the 5 you mentioned would be a disaster.
Nice in the sense that we have two young quality starters in Blackmon and Hankerson and serviceable yet youthful WRs in Paul, Robinson and Austin for the future (not necessarily next season as I assume both Gaffney and Moss will be back).

I think it'll take time for the rest of these guys to develop, but I certainly think they have value and were kept for a reason. Why have so many WRs on a team with this many deficiencies if you don't think they can play?

Paul is an excellent blocker in the run game and a very good special teamer. Had Nebraska not been a run first team, I've read several scouts say that he would have been drafted significantly higher.

It seems like they really like Robinson. While he wasn't activated for much of the season, the coaching staff still felt he had value and would gain from another offseason. Presumably, they like him in the slot.

Who knows about Austin. I just threw his name in there because he was drafted by Shanahan.

In the end, my excitment is based on promise rather than accomplishments. I just look forward to a young swath of WRs to take the reins.

Last edited by mbedner3420; 01-05-2012 at 05:21 PM.
mbedner3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 05:10 PM   #8
#21Taylor4Ever
Camp Scrub
 
#21Taylor4Ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montgomery County, Md
Age: 49
Posts: 20
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I'm really hoping we can pick up Blackmon if he falls to us. That would be so nice to have Blackmon, Hankerson, Paul, Robinson, and Austin as our WR corp.
Austin must go, and I think you left out Gaffney who definitely deserves to be out there as well.
#21Taylor4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 11:17 PM   #9
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I'm really hoping we can pick up Blackmon if he falls to us. That would be so nice to have Blackmon, Hankerson, Paul, Robinson, and Austin as our WR corp.
Moss will still be in the mix and don't forget about Cooley and Davis. Just need good QB play, which is easier said than done.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 11:34 PM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Leonard Hankerson is the real deal - he will have a hell of a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
Moss will still be in the mix and don't forget about Cooley and Davis. Just need good QB play, which is easier said than done.
I would put the quarterback conundrum as such:

For great personnel guys, good quarterback play isn't difficult at all to find. You can get it pretty much via free agency, bargain basement scouting, draft, trade, whatever.

For mediocre personnel guys, quarterbacks good enough to obscure the other flaws on your roster are nearly impossible to find.

Keep putting good people in the organization, and the quarterback will have great numbers. Whether you attribute that to the QB or his environment isn't really important. You'll enjoy great seasons by the quarterback if you have smart people who are allowed to do their jobs.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.41120 seconds with 11 queries