Concerns about Daniels?

sandman89 · 08-19-2007, 03:56 AM

k guys he had 3 tackles a week ago and made no pressure now this week he had no tackles and no pressure.Andre Carter looked good today and should of had that sack but mist Bens Foot and which had Ben to scramble.I think the skins need to bring in Rice ...............Don't sign him first ,Lets see how he fits in than we could probably sign him cause Daniels is not doing the job.

dmek25 · 08-19-2007, 05:01 AM

i say no to rice. i thought the first team defense looked strong. while rice would help with his pass rush, his salary, age, and attitude, are all minuses

dmek25 · 08-19-2007, 05:03 AM

and for some reason it seems like daniels gets stronger as the season goes on

Luxorreb · 08-19-2007, 05:51 AM

Daniels hasn't been productive, but in my mind the obvious problems are with the offensive line. That left side is unproven and included 4 different people since camp started. And doesnt look good so far.

Daseal · 08-19-2007, 08:18 AM

Changed thread title makes my post useless =(

MTK · 08-19-2007, 10:11 AM

Daniels just needs to be stout against the run.

70Chip · 08-19-2007, 10:29 AM

Daniels has the size to play the run. Marcus Washington is suppossed to play the end in passing situations with P.D. either moving inside of him or going out. Daniels is a huge guy who stands up well against the run. We don't need another pass rushing specialist getting pancaked in the running game.

I was an advocate for drafting DE but they have shut me up. They look great. Back to 04 and 05 if they stay healthy.

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR · 08-19-2007, 01:30 PM

why be concerned> we all know he cant play. Nothing new here.

sandman89 · 08-19-2007, 02:27 PM

IDK maybe its cause Griffin isn't starting i guess but We need another DE over there but for now keep things the same.Where doing good in the D ,

holcknowsbest · 08-19-2007, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR

why be concerned> we all know he cant play. Nothing new here.

cant play what, DE? i think hes what we want over there. the rice deal is horrible idea we will get run over. daniels is not a pass rushing specialist and he never was...hes a good all around player. hell get 5-10 sacks but he is in there to stand up against the run. thats why we have him.

chrisl13 · 08-19-2007, 03:21 PM

Rice is going to be overpaid and old. this is a no brainer

JWsleep · 08-19-2007, 04:51 PM

So long as they actually get pressure from somewhere, I'm ok with Daniels if the coaching staff is. But the pressure must come, or things will be tough on our secondary again.

The coaches seem committed to sticking with what they got--they can see Daniels numbers, so it must be ok with them. And I agree the key there is run stopping.

How has Carter looked? Any straight pressure from him?

(Forget Rice.)

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR · 08-19-2007, 04:52 PM

daniels is a waste. he will get hurt sometime like he has every year he been here. he will not have around 10 sacks lol.

DieHardSkinsFan777 · 08-19-2007, 04:54 PM

Daniels will be fine....NO TO RICE!

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR · 08-19-2007, 04:56 PM

not say we need rice just i know daniels is not the answer. He had a great game against dallas in 2005 with 4 sacks and that about it.

08-19-2007, 03:56 AM	#1
sandman89 Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 137	Concerns about Daniels? k guys he had 3 tackles a week ago and made no pressure now this week he had no tackles and no pressure.Andre Carter looked good today and should of had that sack but mist Bens Foot and which had Ben to scramble.I think the skins need to bring in Rice ...............Don't sign him first ,Lets see how he fits in than we could probably sign him cause Daniels is not doing the job. __________________ http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/a...ton02GFX/s.png

08-19-2007, 05:01 AM	#2
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Cuncerns about Daniels? i say no to rice. i thought the first team defense looked strong. while rice would help with his pass rush, his salary, age, and attitude, are all minuses __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

08-19-2007, 05:03 AM	#3
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Cuncerns about Daniels? and for some reason it seems like daniels gets stronger as the season goes on __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

08-19-2007, 05:51 AM	#4
Luxorreb ^21^ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, Virginia Age: 53 Posts: 1,630	Re: Cuncerns about Daniels? Daniels hasn't been productive, but in my mind the obvious problems are with the offensive line. That left side is unproven and included 4 different people since camp started. And doesnt look good so far. __________________ ^21^

08-19-2007, 08:18 AM	#5
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 42 Posts: 8,341	Re: Cuncerns about Daniels? Changed thread title makes my post useless =( __________________ Best. Player. Available.

08-19-2007, 10:11 AM	#6
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	Re: Concerns about Daniels? Daniels just needs to be stout against the run. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

08-19-2007, 10:29 AM	#7
70Chip Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 54 Posts: 3,048	Re: Concerns about Daniels? Daniels has the size to play the run. Marcus Washington is suppossed to play the end in passing situations with P.D. either moving inside of him or going out. Daniels is a huge guy who stands up well against the run. We don't need another pass rushing specialist getting pancaked in the running game. I was an advocate for drafting DE but they have shut me up. They look great. Back to 04 and 05 if they stay healthy. __________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven

08-19-2007, 01:30 PM	#8
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: va Age: 58 Posts: 890	Re: Concerns about Daniels? why be concerned> we all know he cant play. Nothing new here.

08-19-2007, 02:27 PM	#9
sandman89 Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 137	Re: Concerns about Daniels? IDK maybe its cause Griffin isn't starting i guess but We need another DE over there but for now keep things the same.Where doing good in the D , __________________ http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/a...ton02GFX/s.png

08-19-2007, 03:21 PM	#11
chrisl13 Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland Posts: 363	Re: Concerns about Daniels? Rice is going to be overpaid and old. this is a no brainer

08-19-2007, 04:51 PM	#12
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 56 Posts: 4,719	Re: Concerns about Daniels? So long as they actually get pressure from somewhere, I'm ok with Daniels if the coaching staff is. But the pressure must come, or things will be tough on our secondary again. The coaches seem committed to sticking with what they got--they can see Daniels numbers, so it must be ok with them. And I agree the key there is run stopping. How has Carter looked? Any straight pressure from him? (Forget Rice.) __________________ Hail from Houston!

08-19-2007, 04:52 PM	#13
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: va Age: 58 Posts: 890	Re: Concerns about Daniels? daniels is a waste. he will get hurt sometime like he has every year he been here. he will not have around 10 sacks lol.

08-19-2007, 04:54 PM	#14
DieHardSkinsFan777 Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 110	Re: Concerns about Daniels? Daniels will be fine....NO TO RICE!

08-19-2007, 04:56 PM	#15
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: va Age: 58 Posts: 890	Re: Concerns about Daniels? not say we need rice just i know daniels is not the answer. He had a great game against dallas in 2005 with 4 sacks and that about it.

Concerns about Daniels?

Locker Room Main Forum