Luxorreb
01-11-2006, 08:44 AM
OH and by the way, he ain't no Marcus Vick.
He's a true baller.
Vick jr is the ultimate 'pretender'!
Sorry Tech fans, but Marcus is no Michael and well Michael isn't in the playoffs...
FRPLG
01-11-2006, 08:53 AM
I love the other ref saying "are you sure Mike?" when Carey said he wouldn't throw a penalty on Pittman. Seemed to me like he thought there ought to be a penalty on both guys. As I have said before there SHOULD have been a penalty on both. retaliation is not allowed whether the ref thinks it was justified or not. If the league rule is to eject someone for spitting that is a bs rule. If it was Mike Carey deciding it was ejection worthy then he has some serious thinking to do about the game he officiates. Saying it is ok to throw a punch right in front of a ref but it is not ok to spit is a real slippery slope.
Now the question is how the hell doesn't the spit show up on the other angle. That is crazy because it is 100% clear in theat angle. Sorta weird. I was convinced he hadn't spit.
TheMalcolmConnection
01-11-2006, 08:59 AM
Yeah. I think it's weird too. Like that is a HUGE wad of spit.
I think from the original angle you can't see the spit because it falls to the ground pretty quickly right in front of ST, so his body blocked out the view of the spit.
I don't understand why people are so hung up on Pittman not getting a penalty. Even if Pittman got a penalty, ST was still kicked out and that was the part of this whole thing that really could have hurt us.
TheMalcolmConnection
01-11-2006, 09:18 AM
I think from the original angle you can't see the spit because it falls to the ground pretty quickly right in front of ST, so his body blocked out the view of the spit.
I don't understand why people are so hung up on Pittman not getting a penalty. Even if Pittman got a penalty, ST was still kicked out and that was the part of this whole thing that really could have hurt us.
Because it's the only thing left we can get hung up on. :(
TheMalcolmConnection
01-11-2006, 09:18 AM
I'm sure the coaches had a LOOOONG talk with him. I hope he keeps his mouth shut and let his play do the talking on Saturday.
FRPLG
01-11-2006, 09:22 AM
I think from the original angle you can't see the spit because it falls to the ground pretty quickly right in front of ST, so his body blocked out the view of the spit.
I don't understand why people are so hung up on Pittman not getting a penalty. Even if Pittman got a penalty, ST was still kicked out and that was the part of this whole thing that really could have hurt us.
Well I don't think one ought to be kicked out of a game for it. I just personally don't think it is that bad. Because of that it pisses me off that a guy like Sean Taylor gets punished but the other equally wrong player doesn't. I don't think Pittman should get kicked out for his role but I do think it is incumbent upon the refs to call games fairly and obey the rules. The video proving he spit did two things. It proved to me he spit and it proved to me that Mike Carey made an arbitrary decision that one thing was worse than the other. So much worse in fact that apparently breaking the rules directly in front on a ref was ok. What that does is it allows everyone to globaly castiagte Taylor and it lets Pittman off scott free both in the game and ultimately the media. That changes perceptions of the incident and perceptions of Taylor that affect how he is treated during games. Now he gets watched more closely and all of a sudden maybe that perfectly timed hit gets a penalty or something like that. It puts Taylor unfairly in the cross hairs for something that was really basically harmless. If both guys get penalties the situation gets dissolved more benignly and none of us are having this discussion I think. Offsetting penalties get talked about for three seconds on the broadcast and they move on. I am sure we can all agree that the penalty was called for but the ejection seemed awful quick and uncalled for. It makes one wonder why Taylor was held to a higher standard?
onlydarksets
01-11-2006, 09:23 AM
I'm surprised he can get that kind of distance without cocking his head back...
Well, he is a beast...
FRPLG
01-11-2006, 09:29 AM
And to add quickly. Lets say the coaches do have a long talk with him. And they tell him to tighten up and not get in situations that could result in the same punishments. We all know that guys like Taylor (and half the rest of the league) aren't going to simply stop trash talking and stuff like that so it is unreasonable to expect Taylor to simply put his head down and do nothing from now on. So with that in mind they try to help him understand what is acceptable and what isn't. Not calling the penalty on Pittman says "You can punch a guy if he provoked you enough". Do we really want Taylor or anyone else out there trying to figure what he can do and what he can't. It should be black and white. Spitting = penalty and ejection apparently. Punching = penalty maybe if the ref feels like it. One is balck and white while the other clearly isn't. Now we got guys trying to decide when it is ok to retaliate and when it isn't. This is more of a fundamental tenant that retalation should not be allowed for any reason and not just in this situation.
I just don't like our guy getting stomped on by everyone like he tried to murder the guy and I think the main reason it is happeneing is that the NFL has done nothing to diffuse this illusion that Taylor did the "worse that could ever be done". Hell they didn't even enforce their own rules. That's crappy.
Personally I thought an ejection for spitting at another player was appropriate.