Cowboys cut T.O.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22

saden1
03-05-2009, 07:55 PM
What a stupid list...would expect teams that want him to say they do? Everyone is evaluating the pros and cons of having TO on their team.

Pocket$ $traight
03-05-2009, 08:04 PM
Williams is talented but I don't know about a monster year. Cooley is as good as Witten if not better. IMO.

If he can have 1200 yards in Detroit he will have a huge year as the #1 receiver in Dallas.

Cooley is right there with Witten as a pass catcher and ball carrier (maybe a shade better) but he isn't near the blocker that Witten is.

Witten can shut down our ends without help, at least he could before the big boy showed up!

Redskins8588
03-05-2009, 08:23 PM
On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3954188)

GMScud
03-05-2009, 08:24 PM
On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3954188)

I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

Redskins8588
03-05-2009, 08:28 PM
I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

I agree that we are probably not going to go after a WR, but if we did I wouldn't mind Holt coming in and helping the younger guys and take some pressure off of Moss...

53Fan
03-05-2009, 08:31 PM
I don't think Holt would be cheap but he is a hell of a receiver. I heard someone say after what Housh and Coles got, Holt thinks he could get a good contract too.

FRPLG
03-05-2009, 08:34 PM
I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

GMScud
03-05-2009, 08:37 PM
I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

Make that 14.02%.

I wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

53Fan
03-05-2009, 08:45 PM
Apparently there are some GM's in the league who share the same genetic defect or that POS SIDE- SHOW called T.O. would have been out of the league a few years ago.

44ever
03-05-2009, 08:56 PM
Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum