Cowboys cut T.O.

Holt over TO anyday!!!!!! Holt is the consumate professional. I know it is unlikely we will go for him, but he might be a decent grab if the money isn't too steep, but of course it will probably be since the Haynesworth deal.

If he can have 1200 yards in Detroit he will have a huge year as the #1 receiver in Dallas.

Cooley is right there with Witten as a pass catcher and ball carrier (maybe a shade better) but he isn't near the blocker that Witten is.

Witten can shut down our ends without help, at least he could before the big boy showed up!


Roy is great, but everything depends on Romo. I think Romo could be in for a bumpy ride in '09.

Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.


Funny. TO would piss off Moss and ARE with his antics. I think the Holt angle would be beneficial though.

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.


I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

I voted no also. Entertained the thought myself. But thats as far as it went.

I voted no, I maintain no, and I would not ever say anything except no.

BUT

Some team will say yes, and when they do their reason will be that TO will play lights out his first season, and they would be right. Then they will say that they have the personnel and staff to keep him happy/calm and they would be wrong!

My vote is that he will go to the Raiders, and finish his career there. (any tupa award available here?)

I didn't even entertain the thought, for two reasons- first off, he's obviously a gigantic malignant tumor in any locker room, and secondly he's 35 years old. His skills are bound to start falling off soon.

I would however entertain the thought if he was 5 or so years younger, despite his me-first antics.

Herman Edwards made a great comment about TO on SportsCenter this morning. He said, "you can't marry TO (i.e. long term deal), you can only date him for a year or two." I thought that was funny and right on.

I didn't even entertain the thought, for two reasons- first off, he's obviously a gigantic malignant tumor in any locker room, and secondly he's 35 years old. His skills are bound to start falling off soon.

I would however entertain the thought if he was 5 or so years younger, despite his me-first antics.

Herman Edwards made a great comment about TO on SportsCenter this morning. He said, "you can't marry TO (i.e. long term deal), you can only date him for a year or two." I thought that was funny and right on.

Kinda like the Hottest girls always seem to be the craziest. I found that out the hard way.

A Dallas reporter was asked if T.O. had failed during his time as a Cowboy. The reporter said that "T.O. had talked about bringing a championship to Dallas when he signed there and he did'nt, so in that regard yes" I'm paraphrasing but let's face it, they didn't even win a playoff game so really, how valuable is T.O.? Not that it all should be on his shoulders, but it's not like they were Detroit when he got there.

Never mind, a more up to date list.... and YES of course the iggles earned there spot.

T.O.? THE ANSWER IS NO. | Philadelphia Inquirer | 03/05/2009 (http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/TO_THE_ANSWER_IS_NO.html)

Posted by Mike Florio on March 5, 2009, 11:17 a.m. EST

As we’re doing with Mike Vick, we’ll be keeping a running tally of all of the teams that have said ”thanks” followed immediately by “no thanks” to the possibility of signing receiver Terrell Owens.

Please note that this only reflects teams that already have said that they’re not interested:

The Dallas Cowboys. (Duh.)

The New York Giants.

The Washington Redskins.

The Baltimore Ravens.

The San Francisco 49ers.

The Minnesota Vikings.

The Atlanta Falcons.

The Cleveland Browns.

The San Diego Chargers.

The Philadelphia Eagles.

The New York Jets.

The Tennessee Titans.

The St. Louis Rams.

Here are the teams that likely will join the list soon:

The Miami Dolphins.


Pretty sad if you think about it,I mean really these teams have come out and sad ..."no matter how bad we are...WE DON"T WANT YOU"!