Execution Sucks!

We might not have the best WR corps in the league, but please man, we are better then the Bills...., Arizona, Cincy, and the Giants.....those teams look like freaking offensive machines compared to us....

Is this thread about the offenses execution? Because if it is im in favor of it! :laughing2

John Mckay you had to love him!

Is this thread about the offenses execution? Because if it is im in favor of it! :laughing2

John Mckay you had to love him!

LOL. that's great

I don't really care if no one seconds that opinion..that is my opinion. The conservative play calling got us down the field in the first half just fine and kept the Eagles' O off the field. Wouldn't you want the Eagles' O off the field as much as possible?

actually iggles penalties kept that drive alive ;)

seriously, if you think players need to play perfect games and never drop balls ever, than its time for a reality check... no RB consistantly hits 60+ yarders... the better speed backs might get 5-6 of those in a season... but we have no deep threat to get portis past the line and into open field to work.

Since we have nothing to lose, gibbs should seriously experiment, try deep passing, try shotgun, try 5 WR sets, try anything he can so we don't suck so horribly next year...

[QUOTE=Ramseyfan]Portis, Coles, Gardner, Samuels, etc. they're junk.

Come on. We've got one of the best rosters in the league.[/QUOTE

I wouldn't say best. More like overpaid.....

gortiz:

When Arizona has both Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin on the active roster, their WR corps is much better than the Skins. Boldin is better than ANYONE on the Skins' roster and Fitzgerald is certainly as good as Coles and maybe better.


Would anyone trade the Skins' WRs even-up for the ones on the Colts? If the Skins are so talented, someone might actually think that they'd rather keep the Skins' contingent. That would be a BAD move. Same with the Rams, and the Vikings and the Eagles and the Seahawks and the Patriots and the Chiefs - - and maybe even a few others.


Folks:

Is is POSSIBLE that the game plan to throw the ball short and to throw it quickly was created as a means to keep the Eagles from blitzing the bejeepers out of Patrick Ramsey? You may have noticed that the Eagles blitzed less than half as often as they typically do; maybe that was the offensive game plan's intent???

The players on the field need to be accountable and responsible for yesterday's loss. The score was 14-6 and it was first and goal at the Eagles' ten yardline. Get a TD there and even without a two point conversion, the Skins are in the game. The next sequence of events includes three penalties and two dropped passes. The game plan didn't do that; the coaching staff didn't do that. And then there was a missed field goal.

So onto the field comes the defense. Remember, this is the unit that everyone is raving about now because of its statistical ranking in terms of yards allowed. What the Skins need here is a turnover or at the very least a "three-and-out". Was I hallucinating when I saw the Eagles march down the field and get a TD on a drive of about 65 yards? The game was OVER then and there. And the offensive game plan had nothing to do with that.

By the way, when you talk about "execution", you need also to recognize that there are certain plays and certain times of the game where execution matters more than at other times. Yesterday, the Skins' defense put the Eagles in 15 third down situations. Then they gave up the first down 9 times. That was not the game plan's fault...

Sportscurmudgeon hit the nail on the head with his comments, EXCELLENT post!!! Let me ask one simple question are we better off with Gibbs today then any of the previous coaches. While this is not a over night fix we have been in every game this year unlike years past. Our offense will come around one game this year or next year then watch out. I refuse to blame refs or injuries for our issues as these happen every year to every team. Our defense has been hit the hardest but still keep on comming. The offense take stime to actually learn the plays and know how to adjust at the line. Peyton Manning is showing what he can do but he has been with his O-coordinator for a long time. So unfortunatly patience should be our virtue here.

I can't buy that anology, reason? They did have players up on the line of scrimmage how many of those quick reciever screen's did they just mis picking off? We just threw it out before they could really get up field, regardless if their bringing the blitz package you look for 1 on 1 matchup's downfield, and hit draw's and screen's, if they don't we should be able to run, and throw short passes but to say we had a short passing game yesterday is an understatment we threw 80% of our passes parallel to the line of scrimmage so we didn't have any kind of passing game plan IMO, obviously whatever Gibb's intent it wasen't working, our offensive game plan did affect us late in the game, against a team like philli you have to control the ball and keep there offense off the field, how demoralizing do you think it is for a defense to have to constantly look at an offense that no matter what can't score a TD? Eventually your going to start feeling no matter what you do your going to lose because you can't score, this offense makes the Raven's look like a juggernaut, if the game plan is to throw short and it's not working you have to change that's football, it's all about adjusting we were going to lose the way we were going you have to take your shot's down field, it almost look's like to me that Gibb's would rather lose and have no turnover's, than win with a couple of INT's, I feel I am still watching SS coach this team all we can do is WR screen's

gortiz:

When Arizona has both Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin on the active roster, their WR corps is much better than the Skins. Boldin is better than ANYONE on the Skins' roster and Fitzgerald is certainly as good as Coles and maybe better.


Would anyone trade the Skins' WRs even-up for the ones on the Colts? If the Skins are so talented, someone might actually think that they'd rather keep the Skins' contingent. That would be a BAD move. Same with the Rams, and the Vikings and the Eagles and the Seahawks and the Patriots and the Chiefs - - and maybe even a few others.


The Seahawks? Talk about dropped balls, Robinson and Jackson drop more than any other duo in the league.

The Chiefs, you've got to be freaking kidding me. Watch out Pro-Bowlers, Johnnie Morton might join your ranks one day.

The Eagles have a horrible WR corps - Pinkston and Mitchell were complete busts until TO came to Philly.

The Vikings and Rams do have better wideouts than the 'Skins, but then again who can match up against Moss, or Holt & Bruce?

The Patriots don't necessarily have better wideouts, they've got one of the best QBs in the league who could make our grandparents look good.

I don't think I heard a single person say before the season that we needed to upgrade our WR corps, everyone was saying how deep and awesome that unit is.

The Seahawks? Talk about dropped balls, Robinson and Jackson drop more than any other duo in the league.

The Chiefs, you've got to be freaking kidding me. Watch out Pro-Bowlers, Johnnie Morton might join your ranks one day.

The Eagles have a horrible WR corps - Pinkston and Mitchell were complete busts until TO came to Philly.

The Vikings and Rams do have better wideouts than the 'Skins, but then again who can match up against Moss, or Holt & Bruce?

The Patriots don't necessarily have better wideouts, they've got one of the best QBs in the league who could make our grandparents look good.

I don't think I heard a single person say before the season that we needed to upgrade our WR corps, everyone was saying how deep and awesome that unit is.

I agree 100% RF, and I'm happy with our receiver corps.