Haynesworth to the Patriots for a 5th rounder.

Even now I'm so tired of talking about this guy, and going by Rak's comments a couple days ago I think this will be a huge weight off the team's shoulders. Good riddance.

I disagree. It is simply a recognition Philly's system would work better for Haynesworth and a recognition of AH's twisted mentality.

We new what system we wanted to run and are building to it. It is a system that AH would NEVER excel in as more than a role player. On the other hand, Philly runs, and has already built, a system conducive to Haynesworth's skill set with a DL coach who got the most out of him.

On top of that, although not motivated by money, AH has a twisted sense of self worth and, when he feels he has been treated with disrespect, he either runs in the corner and pouts or plays like a beast. In a system where he can take out his frustrations and, literally, be the big man on a small team, it is more likely he would have played like a beast - particularly against us.

Why put him in a situation where he may excel against us? I got no problem not trading him to Philly, the team that probably values him the most. It is a recognition of the realities involved not an admission that we should have accomodated AH while he was here.

Again, we got something for a nothing - just like in the Jarmon & McNabb trades.

Thank God he is gone and Good F'ing riddance. I shall do my best never to type about that big fat lazy good-for-nothing warped little cry-baby a**hole again!

Very good post.

I disagree. It is simply a recognition Philly's system would work better for Haynesworth and a recognition of AH's twisted mentality.

We new what system we wanted to run and are building to it. It is a system that AH would NEVER excel in as more than a role player. On the other hand, Philly runs, and has already built, a system conducive to Haynesworth's skill set with a DL coach who got the most out of him.

On top of that, although not motivated by money, AH has a twisted sense of self worth and, when he feels he has been treated with disrespect, he either runs in the corner and pouts or plays like a beast. In a system where he can take out his frustrations and, literally, be the big man on a small team, it is more likely he would have played like a beast - particularly against us.

Why put him in a situation where he may excel against us? I got no problem not trading him to Philly, the team that probably values him the most. It is a recognition of the realities involved not an admission that we should have accomodated AH while he was here.

Again, we got something for a nothing - just like in the Jarmon & McNabb trades.

Thank God he is gone and Good F'ing riddance. I shall do my best never to type about that big fat lazy good-for-nothing warped little cry-baby a**hole again!I still believe that the Redskins could and should have gotten an elite player out of an elite player. And my big point was: that the Redskins clearly agreed with you about Haynesworth. That's why they didn't let him got to Philly and come and dominate us twice a year for the next two years.

It's just all very disappointing in the end. I think saying we had nothing in Haynesworth is true in the nominal sense, but the Redskins have no one to blame but themselves from that. Unfortunately, "themselves" starts with Cerrato/Zorn/Sherm Smith, and finished with Shanahan/Allen/Haslett. Lots of people to blame for this trade, every one of them part of the Redskins coaching staff or management.

Haynesworth is responsible for being despised by his Redskin teammates, but that shouldn't have affected his trade value much.

Even now I'm so tired of talking about this guy, and going by Rak's comments a couple days ago I think this will be a huge weight off the team's shoulders. Good riddance.

We need to enact "Proposition 92"

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Redskins DL situation is shaping up. You have Cofield (and probably Cullen Jenkins) on the way in. You have Vonnie Holliday, Adam Carriker, and Jarvis Jenkins at the ends. And Anthony Bryant and Kemoeatu at the tackles.

There might be room for either Kedric Golston or Darrion Scott at this position as well. But once Jenkins is brought in, this position looks pretty settled.

Redskins DL situation is shaping up. You have Cofield (and probably Cullen Jenkins) on the way in. You have Vonnie Holliday, Adam Carriker, and Jarvis Jenkins at the ends. And Anthony Bryant and Kemoeatu at the tackles.

There might be room for either Kedric Golston or Darrion Scott at this position as well. But once Jenkins is brought in, this position looks pretty settled.

GTripp, who would you play at NT, Cofield or Jenkins?

Sent from my Samsung Epic 4G.

Redskins DL situation is shaping up. You have Cofield (and probably Cullen Jenkins) on the way in. You have Vonnie Holliday, Adam Carriker, and Jarvis Jenkins at the ends. And Anthony Bryant and Kemoeatu at the tackles.

There might be room for either Kedric Golston or Darrion Scott at this position as well. But once Jenkins is brought in, this position looks pretty settled.

Technically we don't have tackles in a 3-4 scheme. Although I know we play that from time to time.

i liked mcnabb, but he became a distraction just with the way things worked out, so ditching him, AH, and rabach pretty much eliminates the top 3 targets of fan complaints.

and we got some picks from guys we weren't going to keep and some cap room - so great job! not as good as not making the mistakes in the first place, but better late than never...

GTripp, who would you play at NT, Cofield or Jenkins?

Sent from my Samsung Epic 4G.


Don't forget about Chris Neild. I think that kid could turn into a really good NT.

GTripp, who would you play at NT, Cofield or Jenkins?

Sent from my Samsung Epic 4G.Well, the positions are basically the same. You're either head up over the tackles or head up over the center.

It's really important to control the line of scrimmage. Neither Jenkins or Cofield is really that kind of player, but they're both clearly starters in this league, and on this team in particular.