Trump 2.0 Administration Golden Years

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43

Chico23231
11-11-2025, 10:22 AM
The Dems were never going to get the funding for health care, it was only a matter of time before enough caved. Trump has taking paying SNAP benefits to the Supreme Court. He has great distain for the poor as he does everything he cans to starve them and remove their health care.

Isn't the south a very poor region of the nation full of poverty and SNAP and ACA beneficiaries? Trump carried those states, those morons are now facing the consequences of their vote.

Yes playing politics and the Virginia/New Jersey elections were more important for Democrats than funding SNAP benefits. They could have signed the exact same bill 40 days ago. There is no shame with you folks, You applaud it.

Yes let’s talk about the failed Obamacare healthcare legislation that has done nothing to help anyone except load more people on it who shouldn’t qualify and increased healthcare cost across the country since its inception. It’s failed period. And for who? Early retirees:

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/17/aca-enhanced-subsidy-lapse-government-shutdown.html

Fucking boomers, so again a massive burden on the taxpayers to folks who don’t need the help because of comfort of being able to retire early.

The legislation is an absolute failure from what it would say it would do, to what it actually did. It’s been a boon for the healthcare industry, though. Great job

BaltimoreSkins
11-11-2025, 12:39 PM
Yes playing politics and the Virginia/New Jersey elections were more important for Democrats than funding SNAP benefits. They could have signed the exact same bill 40 days ago. There is no shame with you folks, You applaud it.

Yes letÂ’s talk about the failed Obamacare healthcare legislation that has done nothing to help anyone except load more people on it who shouldnÂ’t qualify and increased healthcare cost across the country since its inception. ItÂ’s failed period. And for who? Early retirees:

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/17/aca-enhanced-subsidy-lapse-government-shutdown.html

Fucking boomers, so again a massive burden on the taxpayers to folks who donÂ’t need the help because of comfort of being able to retire early.

The legislation is an absolute failure from what it would say it would do, to what it actually did. ItÂ’s been a boon for the healthcare industry, though. Great job

What do you call it when the federal government refuses to use the emergency SNAP benefits and then takes it to court so they can continue to allow people to starve when a judge rules they need to use the funds? They even went as far as to delete mention of the emergency fund from the USDA website. Isn't that political theater?

I am disappointed in the senate democrats no doubt. If that was what they were going to do they should've just done it. Instead they only put off firing federal employees until the end of January and will definitely lose healthcare.

In terms of the ACA the main reason there is majority of Americans approve it (64%) including 19% of republicans which is the highest it has ever been. Is because it allows for coverage of pre existing conditions which is an abject failure of the private system that nobody wants to revert back to. In terms of increased costs comparing what we had to the ACA, the decade before the ACA 2000-2010 premiums went up 8-10% per a year while wage growth was 2-3%. The decade after the ACA enactment premiums went up at a rate of 4-5% while wages went up 2.5-3%. 2020-2023 premiums went up 3-6% while wages went up 4-5%. My sources (Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF Employer Health Benefits Surveys, 2000–2023), CMS National Health Expenditure Data, Bureau of Labor Statistics)

I am not a fan of the ACA because I believe universal healthcare is the only morally responsible thing for a MDC to do. I also do not like whether my healthcare is decided by the profit margins of a handful of millionaires to billionaires.

So what is the republican solution to this? They have had a decade and have yet to come up with anything in writing. Going back to what we had isn't the answer. I am still waiting for the most favored nation to start reducing pharmaceuticals. There is lots of failure by leadership here.

NC_Skins
11-11-2025, 01:22 PM
Yes playing politics and the Virginia/New Jersey elections were more important for Democrats than funding SNAP benefits. They could have signed the exact same bill 40 days ago. There is no shame with you folks, You applaud it.

...and the GOP could have ended it day one by nuking the filibuster (save me your tired crap about it being some historical shit, it's not. 1970s is not historical)

Let's talk about your side. Trump not only refused to fund SNAP after the court ordered him, but he specifically took the issue to the Supreme Court. That's how bad he hates poor starving kids. Yeah, that's a much worse look than anything Dems did.



The legislation is an absolute failure from what it would say it would do, to what it actually did. It’s been a boon for the healthcare industry, though. Great job


Trump said he had a healthcare bill ready in 2 weeks. That was back in 2017. If the ACA is such a huge failure that you all keep talking about, why hasn't the Republicans put forth a SINGLE healthcare bill in 3 decades? Not a one. Why?

Chico23231
11-11-2025, 10:34 PM
Reminder

ACA Subsidies Weren’t Being Taken Away by GOP, Dems ‘Designed Those Tax Credits to Expire In their own legislation

Shrugs…a democrat failure

CRedskinsRule
11-12-2025, 01:56 PM
Reminder

ACA Subsidies Weren’t Being Taken Away by GOP, Dems ‘Designed Those Tax Credits to Expire In their own legislation

Shrugs…a democrat failureSetting expirations on tax credits isn't a failure. 1 it allows for proper CBO accounting. 2 it allows for revisiting and altering with a deadline in mind. What is an abject failure is the Republicans lack of a promised replacement plan other then back to a system that had been broken.

AND what is even more of an abject failure than the Republicans abject failure is the failure of the moderate republicans and moderate democrats to come up with a bipartisan solution that could carry 2/3rds in both houses.

I'm neither an economist, or healthcare guru, but with all the wisdom and knowledge out there it seems to me there must be a solution that is not all democrat or all republican based.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Giantone
11-12-2025, 08:58 PM
chico for you............

ELJhKli-dmk&t=23s

BaltimoreSkins
11-12-2025, 09:16 PM
So the spending bill includes potential $500,000 payouts to some senators. Unbelievable.

Chico23231
11-13-2025, 09:44 AM
Setting expirations on tax credits isn't a failure. 1 it allows for proper CBO accounting. 2 it allows for revisiting and altering with a deadline in mind. What is an abject failure is the Republicans lack of a promised replacement plan other then back to a system that had been broken.

AND what is even more of an abject failure than the Republicans abject failure is the failure of the moderate republicans and moderate democrats to come up with a bipartisan solution that could carry 2/3rds in both houses.

I'm neither an economist, or healthcare guru, but with all the wisdom and knowledge out there it seems to me there must be a solution that is not all democrat or all republican based.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Yes, so fully remove the Covid credits.those were pandemic only. Government paid 130 billion directly to insurance companies. That ends now, the pandemic is over. We are not extending Covid policy healthcare in the ACA

Obamacare premiums are expected to rise by 18% on average in 2026. With or without

My absolute preference would be massive reforms for the ACA along with reforms within Medicaid.

Obviously we aren’t giving free healthcare to everyone and we aren’t giving free healthcare to folks who aren’t citizens. Can we start with that premise and move forward? And no we aren’t going to give states fungible money so they can get around those principles…start with helping the people who need it.

So that means we are not going to focus on early retirees, people who make 500k a year or 250k individually. That’s not who needs the help.

MTK
11-13-2025, 11:18 AM
So the spending bill includes potential $500,000 payouts to some senators. Unbelievable.

All for being lawfully subpoenaed

Un fucking believable

BaltimoreSkins
11-15-2025, 04:12 PM
I guess the good news is we'll all be getting our $5000 DOGE checks Trump promised us back in May. Any day now....

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum