![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: How well did Brunell play against the Cowboys? | |||
Great |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 8.81% |
Good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 30.19% |
Average |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
81 | 50.94% |
Sub-Par |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 7.55% |
Horrible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 2.52% |
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Quote:
not only that, when i looked at the deep throw chart TAFKAS threw up, guys like peyton threw 50% more deep passes and completed 50% more as well as having a lower int % on deep balls. if you go through the play by plays, they keep track of deep passes and shorter passes that go for big gains. sometimes it seems like GTripp doesn't even bother watching the games, and just looks at the stat lines instead. and GT, you're arguement that the lack of possessions is what's making the offense look bad is crap. brunell has more attempts this year (in 8 games) than he had in 9 in 2004 (with a great defense), and he's on track to have more than he had in 2005 (with a good defense), and he'll be sacked less too. and before you project out how this year's stats will be better than last years - they won't. brunell fades down the stretch, and when we started winning last year, it was in part because we took the ball out of his hands and ran it more... first 8 starts in 2005: 34.8 passes per game, 4-4 record -------------------- 320+ yards twice, 220+ 5 times next 8 starts: 22.4 passes per game, 6-2 record ---------------- under 200 yards EIGHT times (under 160 6 times) when brunell throws 27 times or less per game: 11-2 otherwise: 5-14 and no shit it's somewhat self-serving, but that doesn't seem to bother you (that whole correlation != causation thing). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|