![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: How well did Brunell play against the Cowboys? | |||
Great |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 8.81% |
Good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 30.19% |
Average |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
81 | 50.94% |
Sub-Par |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 7.55% |
Horrible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 2.52% |
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |||||
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Intangibles are very important for a QB (way, way more than 'cannon-arm'..ill get to that later), and while you would be correct in saying that statistics cannot isolate intangibles from talent, you'd be a fool to think a guy's intangibles don't play a huge part in his overall statistical production. If that wasn't true, how could a guy like Chad Pennington, who has a weak arm and no leg speed and a serious rotator cuff injury, put up good numbers year in and year out? Statistics look at the player as a whole, not a bunch of parts. Since you can't put Pennington's head on Favre's body anyway, it doesn't do any good to break a player's game down to the level of "cannon-arm". If you have a cannon-arm and are good, the stats will show it. If you have a cannon-arm and suck, then you are Rob Johnson. Speaking of cannon-arm, wtf makes that an intangible. Intangibles are usually mental things if I'm not mistaken. I would describe cannon-arm as more of a tool. And if tools were the most important thing in a QB, every team would put their best athlete at that position. Quote:
We aren't retarding his growth by not starting him, but for all intents and purposes, we would be conceeding the season.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|