![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
Age: 50
Posts: 429
|
Re: Cap Room
Quote:
__________________
I got nothin' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: Cap Room
i doubt it. i think tagging him would mean he gets a 1 year deal where we pay him the average of the top 5 guards in the league's salary. knowing the deal hutchinson got in minnesota, im sure the average is quite high and he isnt worth THAT much IMO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Cap Room
I think the tag would be a very reasonable option with DD. We have to avoid putting any more big contract stuff into the 2008 and 2009 seasons, and the franchise tag would allow us to load about 5-6 million of our cap space into this year to have dock on board without having to make a commitment to him for the 2008 season and beyond.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: Cap Room
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: Cap Room
What about placing the transition tag on Dockery instead of the franchise tag? We may not get 2 first rounders if he signs elsewhere but at least it gives the Skins the match if other offers come in. I believe the transition tag requires the following - I would assume Dockery is worth this:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Cap Room
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: Cap Room
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|