![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Good for Campbell
Quote:
When you (or anyone) take four Todd Collins starts from 2007 and tries to make a conclusive statement from a couple of good games (and a not-great playoff game), it's hard to take such an apples to oranges comparison seriously. If, and only if, the idea is to suggest that Collins would won more games in the 2007 season than Jason Campbell given a whole season, the position is defensible, but still weak. You probably want more than two well played games to make a claim stronger than just a man's opinion. But, I really don't think that your claim is, "Jason Campbell wasn't our best QB in 2007." I think you are trying to take evidence from 2007, and make a definitive comment about Campbell as a player But you can't take that comparison any further, as things were different when Gibbs left. Collins didn't play at all in 2008, and when he played in 2009 (particularly the KC game), he was poor. I will never knock Todd Collins' approach to the game, as he always came off the bench ready to make a difference (at least until his first hit), but if anything, 2009 proves 2007 to be at least something of a fluke. More to the point, you ignore that Gibbs, Saunders, and Zorn all call their protection in their plays. Your boy Collins never changed the protection at the line either. A lot of NFL offenses do rely on the quarterbacks to set their protections, which I imagine is something we'll see tonight from Shanahan/McNabb. But the fact that it hasn't ever been part of the offense in Washington isn't a discredit to the quarterback's aptitude, but a preference of the offensive coach. There's film evidence of Campbell misreading the coverage, missing open receivers, and not giving plays a chance to develop. There's just as much, if not more, film evidence of him doing a good job in the presnap phase, making fast reads, getting to third and fourth receivers, and making great throw under pressure (he's a top ten quarterback, statistically, under pressure). I don't expect you to understand and be able to analyze QB play, but it'd be nice if you wouldn't appeal to your own ability to do so, which is unquestionably lacking. Your "me against the world" routine is overtly feminine and tiresome. You're not the only person who posts here who thought Jason Campbell left a lot to be desired as a pro quarterback. You may be the only one who thinks that their own opinion is important enough that everyone else must be lacking your attention to detail to arrive at the same conclusion you were able to, but that doesn't mean there aren't people who agree with you. There are also numerous people who disagree with you and provide much stronger evidence to support their claims, which makes you respond with something usually classless and absent of reasoning. Your continued obsession with Campbell, even as you state that he's not "your" problem anymore (as if he ever was), adds very little to this forum.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
|
|