Colt Brennan Says He'll "Play A Ton" In The Preseason

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

DBUCHANON101
07-06-2009, 09:06 PM
I said the guys ie Colt and Chase could be good and are more than the 'system' QB's you say they are. I showed where the offensive coach backed it up with his observations.. what did i omit??

You are trying too hard to prove something but i dont know what it is. maybe you dont either.

Nflnick11
07-06-2009, 09:07 PM
How does scoring 214 points prove that the QB put them in position to score? Most of those points didn't come from the QB throwing TDS. You forgot to state how many of the points came from defensive turnovers.

Remember skins had zero points from defensive turnovers in all 16 games. Maybe 2 TDs from defensive turnovers could have been the difference from being 10-6 compared to 8-8. That really one of the main difference between the skins and the other teams with mediocre QB play who made the playoffs

the point is that our defense put us in position to score, but JC or shuisham couldn't come thru, whereas flacco and the ravens could get some points

DBUCHANON101
07-06-2009, 09:08 PM
We are still waiting on you to answer the mans question...

redskinsgirl
07-06-2009, 09:20 PM
kerry collins is better than JC and he's really the only subpar QB o and flacco that i would consider..flacco had no receivers and still did great, he took chances and won games for the ravens..collins is a great passer can learn an offense in a season and perform, unlike campbell, and he had no receivers as well just a really good RB whose faster than portis, they're defense was as good as ours IMO...Warner is a lot better than JC, he can make reads and is proven, being named MVP a few years ago, and going to 3 SB's, winning one of them, mcnabb isn't subpar he's great and is way better than jason campbell, he isn't afraid to sling it, Eli is better than JC and he isn't afraid to take chances, he passes the ball all over the field, Delhomme is a better QB than Jason, he kept on throwing in the NFC playoff game even after getting picked 6 times, sure he had a bad game but he's been to more pro bowls and super bowls than JC, and the rest of the year he was doing great up till that game, matt ryan isn't subpar, he's in the top 10 IMO of great QB's right now in the league, hes a great game manager, makes plays, throws all over the field knows when to throw it away or take a sack instead of make a play...chad pennington is very accurate, doesn't have that strong of an arm but is a little better JC, cause he can manage and he's been to the playoffs a lot (he's probably the only one on this list that is worth an arguement as to him and JC) he also had to learn an offense very quicky and he didn't take any steps back, and brought last years worst team to the playoffs..Rivers is way better than JC, don't be surprised if Dan goes after him after this year he'll probably be franchised tho...does that answer your question now all those QBs that are in the playoffs last year are better than JC, and some of them had to learn an offense instantly and didn't have all summer like JC to learn it, and two of the them came right out of college...now you tell me why JC can't be like them, come on please tell me, if you think you know football like me, your dead wrong

Did I say all the QBs who made the playoffs were subpar? No I didn't. You didn't answer anything. How are they better? You didn't prove anything.

Collins, Flacco, Big Ben, and Ryan had stats similar or worse to JC and their teams still went to the playoffs. I don't consider them being subpar. I was just saying since you considered JC to be subpar because he didn't throw alot of TDs than, that must mean Collins, Flacco, Ben, and Ryan must be too.

You still haven't explained why Collins, Flacco, Big Ben and Ryan teams were able to go to the playoffs without throwing alot of TDs???

JC actually played similar to the QBs mention above.

Btw Ryan wasn't a top ten QB last season.

Ruhskins
07-06-2009, 09:27 PM
the point is that our defense put us in position to score, but JC or shuisham couldn't come thru, whereas flacco and the ravens could get some points

There is this thing called consistency in making arguments which you don't seem to follow. You clearly stated...

kerry collins is better than JC and he's really the only subpar QB o and flacco that i would consider..flacco had no receivers and still did great, he took chances and won games for the ravens..

Now you changed your argument from "Flacco won games for the Ravens", to "whereas Flacco and the Ravens could get some points". Now this is just a small portion of your argument that I can counter by using those "CRAAAZY" stats.

Here's a rough look at the 2008 Ravens and their performance against other teams. If Flacco indeed "won" games for the Ravens, then I am to assume that this means he produced points at the end of the game that directly led to the win (since to you the fact that they had an elite scoring defense doesn't mean crap to you).

Cincy – W – no 4th qtr TD
Clev – W – no 4th qtr TD (defense holds opponent to low score)
Pit – L – no TDs thrown
Ind – L – no TDs thrown
Mia – W – no 4th qtr TD (defense holds opponent to low score)
Oak – W – no 4th qtr TD (defense holds opponent to low score)
Clev – W – 4th qtr TD thrown (strong showing by offense)
Hou – W – blow out win (defense holds opponent to low score)
NYG – L – blowout loss – no 4th qtr TD thrown
Phil – W - 4th qtr TD thrown (strong showing by offense/defense)
Cin – W – blow out win (defense holds opponent to low score)
Was – W – 4th qtr TD thrown (defense holds opponent to low score)
Pit – L – no TDs thrown
Dal – W – 4th qtr TD thrown (strong showing by offense/defense)
Jax – W – no TDs thrown (defense holds opponent to low score)

I looked at 4th Qtr TDs thrown by Flacco (yes I know I am simplifying this a bit, disregarding his performance that indirectly resulted in points). Now, in the two games I bolded, Flacco did have a strong offensive showing, the opposing teams put up points against the Ravens, and the ability of Flacco to put up points on the board were important to the win.

However, in most of the other games, Flacco did not have to "win" the game as you put it, most of the time the Ravens defense held the opposing team under 14 pts.; and then there are those games where they lost.

DBUCHANON101
07-06-2009, 09:30 PM
Its not all about td's. its about the little things such as converting on 3rd down. making plays to sustain drives. putting their teams in position to score/win.things that those guys did that our QB didnt.

redskinsgirl
07-06-2009, 09:35 PM
the point is that our defense put us in position to score, but JC or shuisham couldn't come thru, whereas flacco and the ravens could get some points

No the point is the Bmore defense scored points and the skins didn't. That is why Ravens was still able to win without the QB throwing a ton of TDS whereas the skins struggled. That the real reason the were averaging 25 points a game.

Ruhskins
07-06-2009, 09:36 PM
Ok, more "craaazy" stats...

kerry collins is better than JC and he's really the only subpar QB o and flacco that i would consider..flacco had no receivers and still did great, he took chances and won games for the ravens..collins is a great passer can learn an offense in a season and perform, unlike campbell, and he had no receivers as well just a really good RB whose faster than portis, they're defense was as good as ours IMO...

Collins had great protection, as Tenn. tied for first as the team with the least QB sacks allowed, funny that you omitted this (well I guess that would hurt your argument).

Ruhskins
07-06-2009, 09:37 PM
Its not all about td's. its about the little things such as converting on 3rd down. making plays to sustain drives. putting their teams in position to score/win.things that those guys did that our QB didnt.

Did you forget to use the quote feature again, kinda hard to have a dialogue if we don't know who you're talking too.

And I love the bolded quote by the way.

DBUCHANON101
07-06-2009, 09:41 PM
No the point is the Bmore defense scored points and the skins didn't. That is why Ravens was still able to win without the QB throwing a ton of TDS whereas the skins struggled. That the real reason the were averaging 25 points a game.

The Ravens Defense scored 25 pts a game??? WOW :)
Our defense was 4th in the league, and maybe they would make big plays if they werent on the field most of the game because our offense couldnt sustain drives thanks to Mr Checkdown.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum