Prospects for Shanahans offense/Hasletts 3-4 D

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Lotus
02-28-2010, 10:27 PM
How about Dan Williams?

He might be a fine nose space eater. Do you think he could provide #4 pick value?

53Fan
02-28-2010, 10:30 PM
How about Dan Williams?

I think him or even Cam Thomas would do well at NT.

CultBrennan59
02-28-2010, 10:33 PM
I think him or even Cam Thomas would do well at NT.

ya add Cody to that, one of those guys could be starters at NT for us from day 1 I believe and Add anthony montgomery to that list of possible NT starters for us, but I think Dan Williams will go in the later rounds to either minnesota or pittsburgh.

53Fan
02-28-2010, 10:38 PM
ya add Cody to that, one of those guys could be starters at NT for us from day 1 I believe and Add anthony montgomery to that list of possible NT starters for us, but I think Dan Williams will go in the later rounds to either minnesota or pittsburgh.

I could see him going in the late first or second. He's rated higher than Thomas and Thomas may have moved up into the second after the Senior Bowl. It's going to be interesting to see how things fall. If there's a run on o-linemen it could change alot of things.

Lotus
02-28-2010, 10:41 PM
I think him or even Cam Thomas would do well at NT.

I agree. They are prototypical space eaters. But I'm looking at Suh or McCoy as one of the smaller, quicker, Jay Ratliff types of NT. Instead of being big cloggers, such smaller NT's also can be playmakers, as Ratliff has shown. Suh or McCoy could be the super-Ratliff, and that would not be a bad thing.

I'm also wondering about who would provide value for a #4 pick if our favorites are gone. I'm not sure that we want to pick Thomas at #4.

53Fan
02-28-2010, 10:53 PM
I agree. They are prototypical space eaters. But I'm looking at Suh or McCoy as one of the smaller, quicker, Jay Ratliff types of NT. Instead of being big cloggers, such smaller NT's also can be playmakers, as Ratliff has shown. Suh or McCoy could be the super-Ratliff, and that would not be a bad thing.

I'm also wondering about who would provide value for a #4 pick if our favorites are gone. I'm not sure that we want to pick Thomas at #4.

No way. I got ya. :thumb:

SBXVII
02-28-2010, 11:01 PM
He can do anything. I'm only half kidding.

Lorenzo Alexander is the Chuck Norris of this football team.


Yep wait till he comes out during a game as a FB. ;)

Lotus
02-28-2010, 11:01 PM
As others have speculated, maybe Haden at #4? Or Berry? Or McLain?

I don't know about others, but I am not convinced that the second best OT or second best QB are worth the #4 pick. Then, barring a trade-down, we have to ask, who is worth #4?

If our favorite QB and OT are gone at #4, what do you think, 53Fan?

53Fan
02-28-2010, 11:33 PM
As others have speculated, maybe Haden at #4? Or Berry? Or McLain?

I don't know about others, but I am not convinced that the second best OT or second best QB are worth the #4 pick. Then, barring a trade-down, we have to ask, who is worth #4?

If our favorite QB and OT are gone at #4, what do you think, 53Fan?

My head is spinning man. I think Bruce Campbell, Brian Buluga, Eric Berry, Joe Haden, Suh, McClain, or Gerald McCoy could all help us. If Okung and Bradford are our first 2 choices and they're gone and we can't trade down, we have a tough choice to make.

Lotus
02-28-2010, 11:47 PM
We could take Anne Hathaway at #4. That would keep everyone else off balance.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum